Research on Anti-Monopoly Law Regulation of Algorithmic Price Discrimination

算法价格歧视行为在当前数字经济时代已经逐渐成为平台企业获取竞争优势的重要手段,其通过收集用户数据、构建“用户画像”并实施“千人千价”的差别化定价提升了市场效率的同时也带来了破坏公平竞争、侵害消费者权益和阻碍市场创新等负面影响。然而当前《反垄断法》在规制此类行为时往往面临市场支配地位认定模糊、监管模式滞后及权利救济障碍等挑战,因此亟需完善市场支配地位的认定标准例如引入用户黏性、数据控制力等参考,推动监管机制创新的同时健全包括集体诉讼制度在内的消费者权益救济途径,通过多方面的规制有效保障消费者合法权益和促进数字市场的公平竞争。In today’s digital economy, algorithmic price discrimination has emerged as a key strategy for platform companies to gain competitive advantages. By aggregating user data, developing “consumer profiles”, and deploying “personalized pricing algorithms”, these practices enhance market efficiency while concurrently generating adverse effects such as distorted competition, infringement of consumer rights, and suppressed innovation. However, the current “Anti-Monopoly Law” faces regulatory challenges, including ambiguities in defining market dominance, outdated supervisory frameworks, and systemic barriers to legal redress. Therefore, it is imperative to refine the criteria for determining market dominance by incorporating factors such as user stickiness and data control power. At the same time, there is a need to innovate regulatory mechanisms and establish comprehensive consumer rights relief channels, including class action systems. Through multi-faceted regulation, it is essential to effectively safeguard consumer rights and promote fair competition in the digital market.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Dispute Settlement
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12677/ds.2025.116195
Primary Topic
Digital Transformation in Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Research on Anti-Monopoly Law Regulation of Algorithmic Price Discrimination

文杰 郑
Dispute Settlement
Digital Transformation in Law
article

Research on Anti-Monopoly Law Regulation of Algorithmic Price Discrimination

文杰 郑
article en

Abstract

算法价格歧视行为在当前数字经济时代已经逐渐成为平台企业获取竞争优势的重要手段,其通过收集用户数据、构建“用户画像”并实施“千人千价”的差别化定价提升了市场效率的同时也带来了破坏公平竞争、侵害消费者权益和阻碍市场创新等负面影响。然而当前《反垄断法》在规制此类行为时往往面临市场支配地位认定模糊、监管模式滞后及权利救济障碍等挑战,因此亟需完善市场支配地位的认定标准例如引入用户黏性、数据控制力等参考,推动监管机制创新的同时健全包括集体诉讼制度在内的消费者权益救济途径,通过多方面的规制有效保障消费者合法权益和促进数字市场的公平竞争。In today’s digital economy, algorithmic price discrimination has emerged as a key strategy for platform companies to gain competitive advantages. By aggregating user data, developing “consumer profiles”, and deploying “personalized pricing algorithms”, these practices enhance market efficiency while concurrently generating adverse effects such as distorted competition, infringement of consumer rights, and suppressed innovation. However, the current “Anti-Monopoly Law” faces regulatory challenges, including ambiguities in defining market dominance, outdated supervisory frameworks, and systemic barriers to legal redress. Therefore, it is imperative to refine the criteria for determining market dominance by incorporating factors such as user stickiness and data control power. At the same time, there is a need to innovate regulatory mechanisms and establish comprehensive consumer rights relief channels, including class action systems. Through multi-faceted regulation, it is essential to effectively safeguard consumer rights and promote fair competition in the digital market.

Dispute SettlementVol. 11(06)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Digital Transformation in Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Research on Anti-Monopoly Law Regulation of Algorithmic Price Discrimination — 文杰 郑 · Dispute Settlement (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS