Key skills and challenges in one-on-one peer support for older adolescents and young adults with serious mental health conditions

<title>Abstract</title> <bold>Background </bold> Peer support for older adolescents and young adults has become increasingly available as a formal mental health service. Alongside this increasing availability has been a steady accumulation of studies examining the potential for peer support to lead to positive outcomes for peer support users. However, a consistent refrain from the literature on peer support is that research and practice are hampered by a lack of theory-based models that specify the activities and skills of specific peer support roles, and describe how skillful practice is linked to outcomes. As part of a larger study intended to help fill this gap, the current study aimed to define and validate a set of key skills and related challenges in one-on-one peer support for older youth and young adults. <bold>Methods</bold> The study engaged peer support specialists (PSSs) and peer support users (PSUs) from first episode psychosis (FEP) and non-diagnostic-specific (NDS) programs across the United States in a series of discussion groups focused on the activities, skills and outcomes of effective peer support. Qualitative analysis of the discussion group material led to the specification of six general skill areas and, within each of these, a series of sub-skills and key practice challenges. In a second phase of the study, the PSSs reviewed a document describing these, rated the importance of each of the skills and challenges, and provided open-ended feedback on wording and conceptualization. Based on feedback, wording of practice skills and challenges was finalized, and a set of related organizational challenges connected to each skill area was added to the document. <bold>Results</bold> All of the mean importance ratings for sub-skills and challenges were above 4.25 on a 5-point scale for which 4 = <italic>very important</italic> and 5 = <italic>extremely important</italic>. PSSs from FEP and NDS programs provided similar ratings for sub-skills and challenges, with a few exceptions. <bold>Conclusions</bold> The final document produced from this study contains information about skills and challenges that has similarities to other studies of PSS skills, but also has unique features. Results from the study have practical implications for training, supervision and organizational development to support the PSS role.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Psychology
Published
2026-07-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-026-05128-7
Primary Topic
Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Key skills and challenges in one-on-one peer support for older adolescents and young adults with serious mental health conditions

Rebecca P. Johnson, Shannon Blajeski, Vanessa V. Klodnick, Janet Walker et al.
BMC Psychology
Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare
article

Key skills and challenges in one-on-one peer support for older adolescents and young adults with serious mental health conditions

Rebecca P. Johnson, Shannon Blajeski, Vanessa V. Klodnick, Janet Walker, Brianne LaPelusa, Maria Hermsen-Kritz
article en

Abstract

<title>Abstract</title> <bold>Background </bold> Peer support for older adolescents and young adults has become increasingly available as a formal mental health service. Alongside this increasing availability has been a steady accumulation of studies examining the potential for peer support to lead to positive outcomes for peer support users. However, a consistent refrain from the literature on peer support is that research and practice are hampered by a lack of theory-based models that specify the activities and skills of specific peer support roles, and describe how skillful practice is linked to outcomes. As part of a larger study intended to help fill this gap, the current study aimed to define and validate a set of key skills and related challenges in one-on-one peer support for older youth and young adults. <bold>Methods</bold> The study engaged peer support specialists (PSSs) and peer support users (PSUs) from first episode psychosis (FEP) and non-diagnostic-specific (NDS) programs across the United States in a series of discussion groups focused on the activities, skills and outcomes of effective peer support. Qualitative analysis of the discussion group material led to the specification of six general skill areas and, within each of these, a series of sub-skills and key practice challenges. In a second phase of the study, the PSSs reviewed a document describing these, rated the importance of each of the skills and challenges, and provided open-ended feedback on wording and conceptualization. Based on feedback, wording of practice skills and challenges was finalized, and a set of related organizational challenges connected to each skill area was added to the document. <bold>Results</bold> All of the mean importance ratings for sub-skills and challenges were above 4.25 on a 5-point scale for which 4 = <italic>very important</italic> and 5 = <italic>extremely important</italic>. PSSs from FEP and NDS programs provided similar ratings for sub-skills and challenges, with a few exceptions. <bold>Conclusions</bold> The final document produced from this study contains information about skills and challenges that has similarities to other studies of PSS skills, but also has unique features. Results from the study have practical implications for training, supervision and organizational development to support the PSS role.

BMC Psychology
Portland State University (US), Oldham Council (GB), The University of Texas at Austin (US)
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Australian Government, Administration for Community Living, National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 100%
Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.