Smart Cities and Socioeconomic Inequality: A Critical Perspective on Smart City Practices in Indonesia

The rapid adoption of smart city initiatives in Indonesia reflects a national ambition to modernize urban governance through digital innovation. However, despite increasing investments in smart infrastructure, significant disparities in socio-economic outcomes remain prevalent. This paradox raises a critical question: Do smart cities in Indonesia truly enhance inclusivity, or do they reinforce existing inequalities? This study aims to critically examine the relationship between smart city implementation and social inequality in five major Indonesian cities: Jakarta, Bandung, Surabaya, Makassar, and Semarang. Using a convergent mixed-methods approach, the research integrates quantitative data analysis—including Smart City Index scores, Gini coefficients, and internet access rates—with qualitative critical discourse analysis (CDA) of policy documents and urban governance narratives. The findings reveal a consistent mismatch between technological advancement and social equity. Cities with high smart city performance often report elevated levels of income inequality, and digital infrastructure remains disproportionately concentrated in urban centers, excluding marginalized communities. Furthermore, policy discourses prioritize efficiency and modernization, while overlooking equity, participation, and redistribution. This study concludes that smart city strategies in Indonesia, as currently designed, risk deepening the digital and social divide. It calls for a redefinition of smart urbanism—one grounded in social justice, participatory governance, and inclusive policy design. Such a shift is essential to ensure that smart technologies genuinely serve all urban residents, not just the digitally privileged.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Interdiciplinary Journal and Hummanity (INJURITY)
Published
2025-04-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.58631/injurity.v4i2.1420
Primary Topic
Smart Cities and Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Smart Cities and Socioeconomic Inequality: A Critical Perspective on Smart City Practices in Indonesia

Daimah Daimah
Interdiciplinary Journal and Hummanity (INJURITY)
Smart Cities and Technologies
article

Smart Cities and Socioeconomic Inequality: A Critical Perspective on Smart City Practices in Indonesia

Daimah Daimah
article en

Abstract

The rapid adoption of smart city initiatives in Indonesia reflects a national ambition to modernize urban governance through digital innovation. However, despite increasing investments in smart infrastructure, significant disparities in socio-economic outcomes remain prevalent. This paradox raises a critical question: Do smart cities in Indonesia truly enhance inclusivity, or do they reinforce existing inequalities? This study aims to critically examine the relationship between smart city implementation and social inequality in five major Indonesian cities: Jakarta, Bandung, Surabaya, Makassar, and Semarang. Using a convergent mixed-methods approach, the research integrates quantitative data analysis—including Smart City Index scores, Gini coefficients, and internet access rates—with qualitative critical discourse analysis (CDA) of policy documents and urban governance narratives. The findings reveal a consistent mismatch between technological advancement and social equity. Cities with high smart city performance often report elevated levels of income inequality, and digital infrastructure remains disproportionately concentrated in urban centers, excluding marginalized communities. Furthermore, policy discourses prioritize efficiency and modernization, while overlooking equity, participation, and redistribution. This study concludes that smart city strategies in Indonesia, as currently designed, risk deepening the digital and social divide. It calls for a redefinition of smart urbanism—one grounded in social justice, participatory governance, and inclusive policy design. Such a shift is essential to ensure that smart technologies genuinely serve all urban residents, not just the digitally privileged.

Interdiciplinary Journal and Hummanity (INJURITY)Vol. 4(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Smart Cities and Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.