Gender and Intellectual Grandstanding

While intellectual grandstanding is a gender-neutral concept, it presents a practical level of diffi culty for women and feminist thinkers. This is the case on at least two fronts. First, men often get a pass for grandstanding, while women do not. Second, women are more often the target of grandstanders. Because grandstanding is often comparative, and women are seen as less rational than men, they are easier foils to use to build one’s own intellectual status. Seeing women as emotional, and thus irrational, occasions men to use them as props for intellectual grandstanding. And, when women have unwelcome things to say, accusing them of being overly emotional is a quick way to silence them. These phenomena, I’ll argue, are two sides of the same coin. Both are a result of the gendering of reason in the Western intellectual tradition. In what follows, I’ll look at just how this works.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Southwest Philosophy Review
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5840/swphilreview20254115
Primary Topic
Historical Gender and Feminism Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gender and Intellectual Grandstanding

Lucy Alsip Vollbrecht
Southwest Philosophy Review
Historical Gender and Feminism Studies
article

Gender and Intellectual Grandstanding

Lucy Alsip Vollbrecht
article en

Abstract

While intellectual grandstanding is a gender-neutral concept, it presents a practical level of diffi culty for women and feminist thinkers. This is the case on at least two fronts. First, men often get a pass for grandstanding, while women do not. Second, women are more often the target of grandstanders. Because grandstanding is often comparative, and women are seen as less rational than men, they are easier foils to use to build one’s own intellectual status. Seeing women as emotional, and thus irrational, occasions men to use them as props for intellectual grandstanding. And, when women have unwelcome things to say, accusing them of being overly emotional is a quick way to silence them. These phenomena, I’ll argue, are two sides of the same coin. Both are a result of the gendering of reason in the Western intellectual tradition. In what follows, I’ll look at just how this works.

Southwest Philosophy ReviewVol. 41(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Historical Gender and Feminism Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.