Is There a Non-Reductionist Account of Second Person Thought?

Second person thought is a particular kind of thought involved in the presentation of another person, often expressed by the pronoun “you.” This Paper explores the possibility of a non-reductionist account of second person thought. Thinking about “you” appears distinct from thinking about “I,” “it,” and “he/she,” but whether we can give an account of second person thought independent of other kinds of thought remains open. According to the demonstrative account, the occurrence of “you” in thought is reducible to a demonstrative, namely “that person addressed,” and has no particular relation to thought. By contrast, many others propose independent and hence original accounts of second person thought. I focus on two versions of such anti-reductionist views, which respectively stem from a Kantian and a Hegelian standpoint. I argue that although both approaches avoid reducing “you” to a demonstrative, neither succeeds in offering an original account of the you-thought.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Southwest Philosophy Review
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5840/swphilreview202541122
Primary Topic
Philosophy and Theoretical Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Is There a Non-Reductionist Account of Second Person Thought?

Bingyong Chen
Southwest Philosophy Review
Philosophy and Theoretical Science
article

Is There a Non-Reductionist Account of Second Person Thought?

Bingyong Chen
article en

Abstract

Second person thought is a particular kind of thought involved in the presentation of another person, often expressed by the pronoun “you.” This Paper explores the possibility of a non-reductionist account of second person thought. Thinking about “you” appears distinct from thinking about “I,” “it,” and “he/she,” but whether we can give an account of second person thought independent of other kinds of thought remains open. According to the demonstrative account, the occurrence of “you” in thought is reducible to a demonstrative, namely “that person addressed,” and has no particular relation to thought. By contrast, many others propose independent and hence original accounts of second person thought. I focus on two versions of such anti-reductionist views, which respectively stem from a Kantian and a Hegelian standpoint. I argue that although both approaches avoid reducing “you” to a demonstrative, neither succeeds in offering an original account of the you-thought.

Southwest Philosophy ReviewVol. 41(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Philosophy and Theoretical Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Is There a Non-Reductionist Account of Second Person Thought? — Bingyong Chen · Southwest Philosophy Review (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS