Affirming the Need to Grow Up

There is no fundamental right to education in the United States (Rodriguez, 1973), but there is a movement to force the federal courts to affirm one (Robinson, 2019). Advocates seek to push federal law beyond its equal protection of the child’s access to state-regulated schooling toward a full-fledged right to an educational minimum that facilitates the person’s incorporation into American society. Arguments for the right vary, but their common aim is to construe education as a “rights multiplier,” i.e., a positive fortifier of political rights like self-government and liberty. If one can prove that some educational minimum is a prerequisite without which the very idea of a free and orderly society is moot, then one can demand that the federal government guarantee it. This paper critiques the “rights-multiplier” theory for understating how the basic need that education addresses – the individual’s need for incorporation into democratic society, the need to grow up – is multifaceted and lifelong.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Southwest Philosophy Review
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5840/swphilreview20254117
Primary Topic
Early Childhood Education and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Affirming the Need to Grow Up

Kelly M. S. Swope
Southwest Philosophy Review
Early Childhood Education and Development
article

Affirming the Need to Grow Up

Kelly M. S. Swope
article en

Abstract

There is no fundamental right to education in the United States (Rodriguez, 1973), but there is a movement to force the federal courts to affirm one (Robinson, 2019). Advocates seek to push federal law beyond its equal protection of the child’s access to state-regulated schooling toward a full-fledged right to an educational minimum that facilitates the person’s incorporation into American society. Arguments for the right vary, but their common aim is to construe education as a “rights multiplier,” i.e., a positive fortifier of political rights like self-government and liberty. If one can prove that some educational minimum is a prerequisite without which the very idea of a free and orderly society is moot, then one can demand that the federal government guarantee it. This paper critiques the “rights-multiplier” theory for understating how the basic need that education addresses – the individual’s need for incorporation into democratic society, the need to grow up – is multifaceted and lifelong.

Southwest Philosophy ReviewVol. 41(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Early Childhood Education and Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.