Evaluating Flow Resistance in Straight Channels Using 2-Point Velocity Measurements

Accurately measuring Manning’s roughness coefficient is crucial for enhancing the precision of hydraulic models and supporting informed decision-making in water resource management. Traditionally, this coefficient is determined using the cross-sectional mean velocity, which may introduce inaccuracies due to its approximate nature. However, estimating Manning’s roughness coefficient through flow velocity distribution analysis remains a relatively underexplored approach. This study aims to improve the accuracy of estimating Manning’s roughness coefficient by analyzing the velocity distribution at two vertical positions within the flow: z/H = 0.2 and z/H = 0.8. Secondary velocity data were obtained from four locations to support this investigation: a laboratory flume, the Selokan Mataram irrigation channel, the Kuning River, and the Opak River. The research methodology involves simplifying and applying analytical equations needed to determine Manning’s roughness coefficient based on the velocity profile. The results indicate that, in natural river systems, Manning’s roughness coefficient ranges from 0.035 to 0.095 at z/H = 0.8 and z/H = 0.2 and from 0.032 to 0.085 at z/H = 0.4 and z/H = 0.2.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Semesta Teknika
Published
2025-05-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18196/st.v28i1.25841
Primary Topic
Fusion materials and technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating Flow Resistance in Straight Channels Using 2-Point Velocity Measurements

Bambang Agus Kironoto, Adam Pamudji Raharjo, Ali Nursamsi Dahlan
Semesta Teknika
Fusion materials and technologies
article

Evaluating Flow Resistance in Straight Channels Using 2-Point Velocity Measurements

Bambang Agus Kironoto, Adam Pamudji Raharjo, Ali Nursamsi Dahlan
article en

Abstract

Accurately measuring Manning’s roughness coefficient is crucial for enhancing the precision of hydraulic models and supporting informed decision-making in water resource management. Traditionally, this coefficient is determined using the cross-sectional mean velocity, which may introduce inaccuracies due to its approximate nature. However, estimating Manning’s roughness coefficient through flow velocity distribution analysis remains a relatively underexplored approach. This study aims to improve the accuracy of estimating Manning’s roughness coefficient by analyzing the velocity distribution at two vertical positions within the flow: z/H = 0.2 and z/H = 0.8. Secondary velocity data were obtained from four locations to support this investigation: a laboratory flume, the Selokan Mataram irrigation channel, the Kuning River, and the Opak River. The research methodology involves simplifying and applying analytical equations needed to determine Manning’s roughness coefficient based on the velocity profile. The results indicate that, in natural river systems, Manning’s roughness coefficient ranges from 0.035 to 0.095 at z/H = 0.8 and z/H = 0.2 and from 0.032 to 0.085 at z/H = 0.4 and z/H = 0.2.

Semesta TeknikaVol. 28(1)
Universitas Gadjah Mada (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Fusion materials and technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Evaluating Flow Resistance in Straight Channels Using 2-Point Velocity Measurements — Bambang Agus Kironoto, Adam Pamudji Raharjo, et al. · Semesta Teknika (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS