Water Interaction Type Affects Environmental DNA Shedding Rates of Terrestrial Mammal eDNA Into Surface Water Bodies

ABSTRACT The analysis of environmental DNA (eDNA) has become a non‐invasive, cost‐efficient, and universal biomonitoring tool, widely applied across the globe. Most eDNA research focuses on aquatic organisms in freshwater and marine environments. eDNA shedding rates are key to interpreting eDNA‐based results, such as for abundance estimations or detection probabilities. Shedding rates have been estimated for several species and life stages; however, virtually all of them are aquatic. As eDNA‐based biomonitoring expands to terrestrial systems, waterborne eDNA from freshwater is increasingly used to assess species presence of terrestrial mammals. When interacting with the water, terrestrial mammals deposit their DNA into the water body, with the amount deposited presumably heavily depending on the interaction type. Here we quantify eDNA shedding rates from domestic dogs during various interactions with water bodies, including “passing by”, “drinking”, “crossing through”, “standing still” and “defecating.” “Crossing through” and “defecating” had the highest DNA shedding rates (both approx. 4 × 10 7 pg/h/ind). All direct water interactions led to eDNA shedding rates several orders of magnitude higher than those of the indirect interaction (“passing by”), resulting in higher eDNA concentrations and, consequently, higher eDNA detection probabilities. This has important implications for interpretations of eDNA‐based data from such water bodies. We also highlight the high variability of eDNA concentrations across experimental replicates, which needs to be accounted for when designing eDNA sampling schemes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental DNA
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.70120
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.15

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Water Interaction Type Affects Environmental DNA Shedding Rates of Terrestrial Mammal eDNA Into Surface Water Bodies

Tamara Schenekar, Gabriele Sauseng
3 citations
Environmental DNA
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
5.15
article

Water Interaction Type Affects Environmental DNA Shedding Rates of Terrestrial Mammal eDNA Into Surface Water Bodies

Tamara Schenekar, Gabriele Sauseng
article en
3 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT The analysis of environmental DNA (eDNA) has become a non‐invasive, cost‐efficient, and universal biomonitoring tool, widely applied across the globe. Most eDNA research focuses on aquatic organisms in freshwater and marine environments. eDNA shedding rates are key to interpreting eDNA‐based results, such as for abundance estimations or detection probabilities. Shedding rates have been estimated for several species and life stages; however, virtually all of them are aquatic. As eDNA‐based biomonitoring expands to terrestrial systems, waterborne eDNA from freshwater is increasingly used to assess species presence of terrestrial mammals. When interacting with the water, terrestrial mammals deposit their DNA into the water body, with the amount deposited presumably heavily depending on the interaction type. Here we quantify eDNA shedding rates from domestic dogs during various interactions with water bodies, including “passing by”, “drinking”, “crossing through”, “standing still” and “defecating.” “Crossing through” and “defecating” had the highest DNA shedding rates (both approx. 4 × 10 7 pg/h/ind). All direct water interactions led to eDNA shedding rates several orders of magnitude higher than those of the indirect interaction (“passing by”), resulting in higher eDNA concentrations and, consequently, higher eDNA detection probabilities. This has important implications for interpretations of eDNA‐based data from such water bodies. We also highlight the high variability of eDNA concentrations across experimental replicates, which needs to be accounted for when designing eDNA sampling schemes.

Environmental DNAVol. 7(3)
University of Graz (AT)
Austrian Science Fund
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
5.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Water Interaction Type Affects Environmental DNA Shedding Rates of Terrestrial Mammal eDNA Into Surface Water Bodies — Tamara Schenekar, Gabriele Sauseng · Environmental DNA (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS