Reimagining Assessment in Creative Education: Application and Practice-Based Evaluation in Art and Design Colleges of Jiangxi, China

This study investigates the assessment criteria applied in art and design education and their impact on student performance in higher education institutions across Jiangxi, China.The primary objective is to identify key issues, influential elements, and effective methods related to application-and practice-based assessment, while evaluating their implications for educational quality and student outcomes.The research explores how assessments are conducted in universities, focusing on the balance between theoretical evaluations and practical, creative performance-such as project submissions, portfolio reviews, and interactive critiques-commonly used in art and design disciplines.A descriptive quantitative research design was adopted, and data were collected through a structured survey involving 500 academic participants from four higher education institutions in Jiangxi.The sample was selected using a simple random sampling technique to ensure impartial representation across diverse academic backgrounds.The survey instrument was developed based on validated literature and pilot-tested for reliability, allowing comprehensive analysis of assessment practices.The findings reveal several critical insights: many institutions still rely on traditional assessment methods, which often fail to capture students' creative potential and practical competencies.However, there is a growing shift towards integrated assessment approaches that emphasize originality, problem-solving, and student engagement.The data also indicate that while some institutions have begun adopting progressive assessment models, inconsistent standards and limited resources continue to hinder their effectiveness.This study is significant for policymakers, educators, and academic administrators as it provides empirical evidence supporting the need for reform in assessment practices within creative disciplines.By aligning assessment methods with the evolving nature of art and design education, institutions can better foster student development, critical thinking, and industry relevance in China's higher education landscape.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development
Published
2025-06-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarped/v14-i2/25597
Primary Topic
Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reimagining Assessment in Creative Education: Application and Practice-Based Evaluation in Art and Design Colleges of Jiangxi, China

Yasmin Hussain, Lai Yixuan
International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development
Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
article

Reimagining Assessment in Creative Education: Application and Practice-Based Evaluation in Art and Design Colleges of Jiangxi, China

Yasmin Hussain, Lai Yixuan
article en

Abstract

This study investigates the assessment criteria applied in art and design education and their impact on student performance in higher education institutions across Jiangxi, China.The primary objective is to identify key issues, influential elements, and effective methods related to application-and practice-based assessment, while evaluating their implications for educational quality and student outcomes.The research explores how assessments are conducted in universities, focusing on the balance between theoretical evaluations and practical, creative performance-such as project submissions, portfolio reviews, and interactive critiques-commonly used in art and design disciplines.A descriptive quantitative research design was adopted, and data were collected through a structured survey involving 500 academic participants from four higher education institutions in Jiangxi.The sample was selected using a simple random sampling technique to ensure impartial representation across diverse academic backgrounds.The survey instrument was developed based on validated literature and pilot-tested for reliability, allowing comprehensive analysis of assessment practices.The findings reveal several critical insights: many institutions still rely on traditional assessment methods, which often fail to capture students' creative potential and practical competencies.However, there is a growing shift towards integrated assessment approaches that emphasize originality, problem-solving, and student engagement.The data also indicate that while some institutions have begun adopting progressive assessment models, inconsistent standards and limited resources continue to hinder their effectiveness.This study is significant for policymakers, educators, and academic administrators as it provides empirical evidence supporting the need for reform in assessment practices within creative disciplines.By aligning assessment methods with the evolving nature of art and design education, institutions can better foster student development, critical thinking, and industry relevance in China's higher education landscape.

International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and DevelopmentVol. 14(2)
Malaysia University of Science and Technology (MY)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.