Predicting Construction Costs with Machine Learning: A Comparative Study on Ensemble and Linear Models

Accurate prediction of construction costs plays a pivotal role in ensuring successful project delivery, influencing budget formulation, resource allocation, and financial risk management. However, traditional estimation methods often struggle to handle complex, nonlinear relationships inherent in construction datasets. This study proposes a process innovation by systematically evaluating six machine learning (ML) models, i.e., Ridge Regression, Lasso Regression, Elastic Net, K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), XGBoost, and CatBoost, on a standardized RSMeans dataset comprising 4,477 real-world construction data points. The primary aim is to benchmark the predictive performance, generalizability, and stability of both linear and ensemble models in construction cost forecasting. Each model is subjected to rigorous hyperparameter tuning using grid search with 5-fold cross-validation. Performance is assessed using R² (coefficient of determination), RMSE (root mean squared error), and MBE (mean bias error), while confidence intervals are computed to quantify predictive uncertainty. Results indicate that linear models achieve modest accuracy (R² ≈ 0.83), but struggle to model nonlinear interactions. In contrast, ensemble-based models outperform significantly, i.e., XGBoost and CatBoost achieve R² values of 0.988 and 0.987, respectively, RMSE values below 0.5, and near-zero MBE. Moreover, confidence interval visualization and feature importance analysis provide transparency and interpretability, enhancing the models’ practical applicability. Unlike prior studies that compare models in isolation, this work introduces a unified, interpretable framework and highlights the trade-offs between accuracy, overfitting, and deployment readiness. The findings have real-world implications for contractors, project managers, and cost engineers seeking reliable, data-driven decision support systems. In summary, this study introduces a scalable and robust ML-based framework that offers process innovation in construction cost estimation, paving the way for more intelligent, efficient, and risk-aware construction project management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Electronics Electromedical Engineering and Medical Informatics
Published
2025-05-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35882/jeeemi.v7i3.799
Citations
2
Primary Topic
BIM and Construction Integration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predicting Construction Costs with Machine Learning: A Comparative Study on Ensemble and Linear Models

Wei Hong Lim, L. Chen, Tarek Berghout, Kim Soon Chong et al.
2 citations
Journal of Electronics Electromedical Engineering and Medical Informatics
BIM and Construction Integration
2.01
article

Predicting Construction Costs with Machine Learning: A Comparative Study on Ensemble and Linear Models

Wei Hong Lim, L. Chen, Tarek Berghout, Kim Soon Chong, Sew Sun Tiang, Abhishek Sharma
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Accurate prediction of construction costs plays a pivotal role in ensuring successful project delivery, influencing budget formulation, resource allocation, and financial risk management. However, traditional estimation methods often struggle to handle complex, nonlinear relationships inherent in construction datasets. This study proposes a process innovation by systematically evaluating six machine learning (ML) models, i.e., Ridge Regression, Lasso Regression, Elastic Net, K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), XGBoost, and CatBoost, on a standardized RSMeans dataset comprising 4,477 real-world construction data points. The primary aim is to benchmark the predictive performance, generalizability, and stability of both linear and ensemble models in construction cost forecasting. Each model is subjected to rigorous hyperparameter tuning using grid search with 5-fold cross-validation. Performance is assessed using R² (coefficient of determination), RMSE (root mean squared error), and MBE (mean bias error), while confidence intervals are computed to quantify predictive uncertainty. Results indicate that linear models achieve modest accuracy (R² ≈ 0.83), but struggle to model nonlinear interactions. In contrast, ensemble-based models outperform significantly, i.e., XGBoost and CatBoost achieve R² values of 0.988 and 0.987, respectively, RMSE values below 0.5, and near-zero MBE. Moreover, confidence interval visualization and feature importance analysis provide transparency and interpretability, enhancing the models’ practical applicability. Unlike prior studies that compare models in isolation, this work introduces a unified, interpretable framework and highlights the trade-offs between accuracy, overfitting, and deployment readiness. The findings have real-world implications for contractors, project managers, and cost engineers seeking reliable, data-driven decision support systems. In summary, this study introduces a scalable and robust ML-based framework that offers process innovation in construction cost estimation, paving the way for more intelligent, efficient, and risk-aware construction project management.

Journal of Electronics Electromedical Engineering and Medical InformaticsVol. 7(3)
University of Batna 1 (DZ), UCSI University (MY), Graphic Era University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
BIM and Construction Integration
2.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.