“Whom Did We Liberate?”: <i>Ihud</i> ’s Opposition to Gaza’s Conquest in 1956 and the Emergence of Arab Positive Neutralism

Abstract This article focuses on the activity of the binational movement Ihud during the years between the Israeli Susannah Operation in 1954 and the withdrawal of the Israeli military rule in Gaza in 1957. During these years, Ihud’s discussion of the Bandung Conference, its rejection of Israeli retaliation policy, its call for the return of the refugees and for the abolition of the martial law reveal the connections between three vertexes of a triangle. These were the struggles against the discrimination of Palestinian citizens of Israel, the call for the repatriation of the refugees and the repairment of their status as stateless, and the adoption of a global policy of positive neutralism. The renewed meeting with the Gaza Strip, with the microcosm of pre-1948 Palestine—which was pictured in the Israeli dominant discourse as an act of “liberation”—was seen as a possibility for an alternative imagination of Israel’s position within the local, regional, and global frameworks. Ihud, therefore, should be examined within the context of the political orientations of Arab positive neutralism.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Palestine/Israel Review
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5325/pir.2.2.0003
Primary Topic
Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“Whom Did We Liberate?”: Ihud ’s Opposition to Gaza’s Conquest in 1956 and the Emergence of Arab Positive Neutralism

Avi-ram Tzoreff
Palestine/Israel Review
Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies
article

“Whom Did We Liberate?”: Ihud ’s Opposition to Gaza’s Conquest in 1956 and the Emergence of Arab Positive Neutralism

Avi-ram Tzoreff
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article focuses on the activity of the binational movement Ihud during the years between the Israeli Susannah Operation in 1954 and the withdrawal of the Israeli military rule in Gaza in 1957. During these years, Ihud’s discussion of the Bandung Conference, its rejection of Israeli retaliation policy, its call for the return of the refugees and for the abolition of the martial law reveal the connections between three vertexes of a triangle. These were the struggles against the discrimination of Palestinian citizens of Israel, the call for the repatriation of the refugees and the repairment of their status as stateless, and the adoption of a global policy of positive neutralism. The renewed meeting with the Gaza Strip, with the microcosm of pre-1948 Palestine—which was pictured in the Israeli dominant discourse as an act of “liberation”—was seen as a possibility for an alternative imagination of Israel’s position within the local, regional, and global frameworks. Ihud, therefore, should be examined within the context of the political orientations of Arab positive neutralism.

Palestine/Israel ReviewVol. 2(2)
Van Leer Jerusalem Institute (IL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

“Whom Did We Liberate?”: <i>Ihud</i> ’s Opposition to Gaza’s Conquest in 1956 and the Emergence of Arab Positive Neutralism — Avi-ram Tzoreff · Palestine/Israel Review (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS