Palliative drainage methods for malignant ureteral obstruction: comparative analysis

The present review provides an in-depth analysis of palliative drainage modalities for the upper urinary tract (UUT) in patients diagnosed with cancer-associated obstructive uropathy. Although nephrostomy-based drainage is widely acknowledged as a valid approach, prolonged utilization of external urinary drainage systems is associated with specific complications and exerts a considerable impact on patients’ quality of life. Consequently, the quest for an optimal variant of prolonged internal urinary tract drainage in this patient population remains an ongoing endeavor. The primary parameters constraining the efficacy of conventional ureteral stenting include stent patency compromise due to tumor compression and stent lumen occlusion resulting from encrustation. Furthermore, the prevalence of stent-related symptomatology in most patients represents a significant clinical concern. This review synthesizes the findings of studies that both elucidate the factors limiting the utility of ureteral stenting in this patient cohort and propose strategies to overcome these limitations through targeted interventions addressing the physical, chemical, and biological determinants of internal ureteral drainage failure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Urology Herald
Published
2025-06-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21886/2308-6424-2025-13-2-79-91
Primary Topic
Ureteral procedures and complications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Palliative drainage methods for malignant ureteral obstruction: comparative analysis

I. E. Mamaev, С. В. Котов, K. I. Glinin
Urology Herald
Ureteral procedures and complications
article

Palliative drainage methods for malignant ureteral obstruction: comparative analysis

I. E. Mamaev, С. В. Котов, K. I. Glinin
article en

Abstract

The present review provides an in-depth analysis of palliative drainage modalities for the upper urinary tract (UUT) in patients diagnosed with cancer-associated obstructive uropathy. Although nephrostomy-based drainage is widely acknowledged as a valid approach, prolonged utilization of external urinary drainage systems is associated with specific complications and exerts a considerable impact on patients’ quality of life. Consequently, the quest for an optimal variant of prolonged internal urinary tract drainage in this patient population remains an ongoing endeavor. The primary parameters constraining the efficacy of conventional ureteral stenting include stent patency compromise due to tumor compression and stent lumen occlusion resulting from encrustation. Furthermore, the prevalence of stent-related symptomatology in most patients represents a significant clinical concern. This review synthesizes the findings of studies that both elucidate the factors limiting the utility of ureteral stenting in this patient cohort and propose strategies to overcome these limitations through targeted interventions addressing the physical, chemical, and biological determinants of internal ureteral drainage failure.

Urology HeraldVol. 13(2)
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University (RU), City Clinical Hospital (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Ureteral procedures and complications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.