The Path of Codification: A Case Study on the Institutional Construction of Incorporating Wild Plant Protection Systems into the Code

Against the backdrop of codification, it is necessary to consider the legislative status quo and theoretical value of the wild plant protection system. Aiming at the legislative shortcomings such as the incomplete legal system for wild plant protection, low hierarchical status, imperfect list system, and inability to connect with other departmental laws, a two-step strategy is proposed. The first step is to identify and fill gaps, summarize, and classify existing norms; the second step is to moderately codify by incorporating relatively important and programmatic provisions into the Ecological Environment Code. It is essential to systematically sort out legal systems, clarify legislative gaps, remedy legislative defects, learn from foreign experience, construct a systematic and ecological wild plant protection system, and enhance the codification level of China’s natural resource regulations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Current Social Issues Studies
Published
2025-05-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.71113/jcsis.v2i6.311
Primary Topic
Ecology and Conservation Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Path of Codification: A Case Study on the Institutional Construction of Incorporating Wild Plant Protection Systems into the Code

Chang Xu
Journal of Current Social Issues Studies
Ecology and Conservation Studies
article

The Path of Codification: A Case Study on the Institutional Construction of Incorporating Wild Plant Protection Systems into the Code

Chang Xu
article en

Abstract

Against the backdrop of codification, it is necessary to consider the legislative status quo and theoretical value of the wild plant protection system. Aiming at the legislative shortcomings such as the incomplete legal system for wild plant protection, low hierarchical status, imperfect list system, and inability to connect with other departmental laws, a two-step strategy is proposed. The first step is to identify and fill gaps, summarize, and classify existing norms; the second step is to moderately codify by incorporating relatively important and programmatic provisions into the Ecological Environment Code. It is essential to systematically sort out legal systems, clarify legislative gaps, remedy legislative defects, learn from foreign experience, construct a systematic and ecological wild plant protection system, and enhance the codification level of China’s natural resource regulations.

Journal of Current Social Issues StudiesVol. 2(6)
Beijing Forestry University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Ecology and Conservation Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.