A Convolutional Neural Network for the Detection of Gravity Waves in Satellite Observations and Numerical Simulations

Abstract Comparisons between observed and model‐resolved gravity waves (GWs) are crucial for evaluating general circulation model (GCM) simulation accuracy and understanding wave characteristics. However, observational noise often obscures waves, complicating such comparisons. To address this, we have developed a GW detection method using a convolutional neural network (CNN). The CNN is trained on Atmospheric Infrared Sounder (AIRS) temperatures with labels indicating wave presence based on Berthelemy et al. (2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere‐2025‐455 ). Their method detects noise‐induced pixel‐to‐pixel variations in horizontal wavelengths; in contrast, the CNN robustly identify waves even when applied to smoothly varying model data. Using this method, we compare stratospheric GWs in boreal winters between AIRS observations and a high‐top GW‐permitting GCM, Japanese Atmospheric GCM for Upper Atmosphere Research (JAGUAR). The results agree well and exhibit similar interannual variability, with discrepancies also identified, including a more zonally elongated distribution of tropical GWs in JAGUAR. This method is broadly applicable to the future use of satellites for guiding wave‐resolving atmospheric model development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geophysical Research Letters
Published
2025-06-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2025gl115683
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.31

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Convolutional Neural Network for the Detection of Gravity Waves in Satellite Observations and Numerical Simulations

Haruka Okui, Lars Hoffmann, Corwin J. Wright, Neil P. Hindley et al.
2 citations
Geophysical Research Letters
Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
2.31
article

A Convolutional Neural Network for the Detection of Gravity Waves in Satellite Observations and Numerical Simulations

Haruka Okui, Lars Hoffmann, Corwin J. Wright, Neil P. Hindley, Peter G. Berthelemy, Andrew Paul Barnes
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Comparisons between observed and model‐resolved gravity waves (GWs) are crucial for evaluating general circulation model (GCM) simulation accuracy and understanding wave characteristics. However, observational noise often obscures waves, complicating such comparisons. To address this, we have developed a GW detection method using a convolutional neural network (CNN). The CNN is trained on Atmospheric Infrared Sounder (AIRS) temperatures with labels indicating wave presence based on Berthelemy et al. (2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere‐2025‐455 ). Their method detects noise‐induced pixel‐to‐pixel variations in horizontal wavelengths; in contrast, the CNN robustly identify waves even when applied to smoothly varying model data. Using this method, we compare stratospheric GWs in boreal winters between AIRS observations and a high‐top GW‐permitting GCM, Japanese Atmospheric GCM for Upper Atmosphere Research (JAGUAR). The results agree well and exhibit similar interannual variability, with discrepancies also identified, including a more zonally elongated distribution of tropical GWs in JAGUAR. This method is broadly applicable to the future use of satellites for guiding wave‐resolving atmospheric model development.

Geophysical Research LettersVol. 52(11)
Forschungszentrum Jülich (DE), University of Bath (GB), The University of Tokyo (JP)
Royal Society, University of Bath, Natural Environment Research Council, Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
2.31
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.