Comparative Analysis of a Cardinal and a Tern Conductor for a 765 KV Transmission Line in Bangladesh

This paper aims to investigate the performance of the two types of Aluminium Conductor Steel Reinforced (ACSR) conductors. The two conductors for a 765 kV transmission line are the Cardinal and the Tern Conductor. The results show that at 75°C, the power loss of the transmission line per phase made in a hexa bundle tern conductor is 1.92 MW power, whereas power loss per phase with the hexa cardinal conductor at the same temperature dissipates 1.6 MW power for 100 km, Moheskhali- Madunaghat long line. The resistance, ohm/km, for the Tern conductor is 20% higher than the Cardinal conductor. The result indicates that the cardinal conductor keeps the audible noise in the limit due to its surface gradients of 14 kV/cm compared to the Tern conductor. The thermal limit of the line for the Cardinal conductor is higher than the Tern conductor. The cardinal conductor is promising for the 765 kV line.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-12-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/iccit64611.2024.11022509
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Thermal Analysis in Power Transmission
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.33
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis of a Cardinal and a Tern Conductor for a 765 KV Transmission Line in Bangladesh

Deepak Kumar Chowdhury, Syed Munimus Salam, Nur Mohammad
1 citations
Thermal Analysis in Power Transmission
0.33
article

Comparative Analysis of a Cardinal and a Tern Conductor for a 765 KV Transmission Line in Bangladesh

Deepak Kumar Chowdhury, Syed Munimus Salam, Nur Mohammad
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This paper aims to investigate the performance of the two types of Aluminium Conductor Steel Reinforced (ACSR) conductors. The two conductors for a 765 kV transmission line are the Cardinal and the Tern Conductor. The results show that at 75°C, the power loss of the transmission line per phase made in a hexa bundle tern conductor is 1.92 MW power, whereas power loss per phase with the hexa cardinal conductor at the same temperature dissipates 1.6 MW power for 100 km, Moheskhali- Madunaghat long line. The resistance, ohm/km, for the Tern conductor is 20% higher than the Cardinal conductor. The result indicates that the cardinal conductor keeps the audible noise in the limit due to its surface gradients of 14 kV/cm compared to the Tern conductor. The thermal limit of the line for the Cardinal conductor is higher than the Tern conductor. The cardinal conductor is promising for the 765 kV line.

Chittagong University of Engineering & Technology (BD)
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Thermal Analysis in Power Transmission
0.33
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparative Analysis of a Cardinal and a Tern Conductor for a 765 KV Transmission Line in Bangladesh — Deepak Kumar Chowdhury, Syed Munimus Salam, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS