There's Nothing to See Here: A Study of Deaf and Hearing Developer Use of Stack Overflow

In this short paper, we analyse the 2022 Stack Overflow developer survey data that, for the only time, included questions on accessibility. We extracted data from both deaf and hearing developers to determine any differences in the way each used Stack Overflow; nine of the original survey questions were explored relating to frequency, nature and extent of Stack Overflow use. Our over-arching aim was to show that there were differences between the two. Based on a randomly selected sample of hearing developers however, we found no evidence of any difference between the two groups across the nine questions. When we ran the same analysis matching the two groups identically on years of coding experience, we found (counterintuitively) marginally more difference. In fact, from eighteen tests in total, only one was statistically significant. Understanding developer accessibility issues is important, but if our results are common across software development practice, then we question the ethos of collecting accessibility data. Developers (deaf or hearing) act in the same way with respect to Stack Overflow use, irrespective of any barriers they may face.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-04-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icse-seis66351.2025.00011
Primary Topic
Psychology of Social Influence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

There's Nothing to See Here: A Study of Deaf and Hearing Developer Use of Stack Overflow

Rumyana Neykova, Thomas Shippey, Giuseppe Destefanis, Nadine Aburumman et al.
Psychology of Social Influence
article

There's Nothing to See Here: A Study of Deaf and Hearing Developer Use of Stack Overflow

Rumyana Neykova, Thomas Shippey, Giuseppe Destefanis, Nadine Aburumman, Alina Miron, Steve Counsell
article en

Abstract

In this short paper, we analyse the 2022 Stack Overflow developer survey data that, for the only time, included questions on accessibility. We extracted data from both deaf and hearing developers to determine any differences in the way each used Stack Overflow; nine of the original survey questions were explored relating to frequency, nature and extent of Stack Overflow use. Our over-arching aim was to show that there were differences between the two. Based on a randomly selected sample of hearing developers however, we found no evidence of any difference between the two groups across the nine questions. When we ran the same analysis matching the two groups identically on years of coding experience, we found (counterintuitively) marginally more difference. In fact, from eighteen tests in total, only one was statistically significant. Understanding developer accessibility issues is important, but if our results are common across software development practice, then we question the ethos of collecting accessibility data. Developers (deaf or hearing) act in the same way with respect to Stack Overflow use, irrespective of any barriers they may face.

University of London (GB), Plastic Logic (United Kingdom) (GB), Brunel University of London (GB)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Psychology of Social Influence
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.