Water Body Detection of Chembarambakkam Lake Using the Combination of NDWI and Random Forest Classification

This paper examines the combination of the Normalized Difference Water Index (NDWI) with the Random Forest Classification (RFC) algorithm to improve the detection of water bodies in satellite data. The NDWI is utilized to emphasize water bodies according to their spectral reflectance characteristics, whilst the RFC enhances the classification procedure by utilizing its ensemble learning features. The NDWI+RFC approach attains an accuracy of 52.92%, a recall of 68.93 %, a specificity of 69.25 %, and an F1-score of 66.73 %. The results markedly surpass the independent NDWI approach, which achieves an accuracy of 45.12%, a recall of 66.82%, a specificity of 67.25%, and an F1-score of 62.41 %. The improved performance illustrates the efficacy of the integrated method for water body recognition, providing a significant resource for hydrological research and environmental assessment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/iccct63501.2025.11020073
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.11
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Water Body Detection of Chembarambakkam Lake Using the Combination of NDWI and Random Forest Classification

Laveet Kumar, S. Saravanan, M. Kalaiyarasi, L. T. Hemalatha
1 citations
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
1.11
article

Water Body Detection of Chembarambakkam Lake Using the Combination of NDWI and Random Forest Classification

Laveet Kumar, S. Saravanan, M. Kalaiyarasi, L. T. Hemalatha
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This paper examines the combination of the Normalized Difference Water Index (NDWI) with the Random Forest Classification (RFC) algorithm to improve the detection of water bodies in satellite data. The NDWI is utilized to emphasize water bodies according to their spectral reflectance characteristics, whilst the RFC enhances the classification procedure by utilizing its ensemble learning features. The NDWI+RFC approach attains an accuracy of 52.92%, a recall of 68.93 %, a specificity of 69.25 %, and an F1-score of 66.73 %. The results markedly surpass the independent NDWI approach, which achieves an accuracy of 45.12%, a recall of 66.82%, a specificity of 67.25%, and an F1-score of 62.41 %. The improved performance illustrates the efficacy of the integrated method for water body recognition, providing a significant resource for hydrological research and environmental assessment.

Saveetha University (IN)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
1.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Water Body Detection of Chembarambakkam Lake Using the Combination of NDWI and Random Forest Classification — Laveet Kumar, S. Saravanan, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS