Benchmarking ChatGPT, Codeium, and GitHub Copilot: A Comparative Study of AI-Driven Programming and Debugging Assistants

With the increasing adoption of AI-driven tools in software development, large language models (LLMs) have become essential for tasks like code generation, bug fixing, and optimization. Tools like ChatGPT, GitHub Copilot, and Codeium provide valuable assistance in solving programming challenges, yet their effectiveness remains underexplored. This paper presents a comparative study of ChatGPT, Codeium, and GitHub Copilot, evaluating their performance on LeetCode problems across varying difficulty levels and categories. Key metrics such as success rates, runtime efficiency, memory usage, and error-handling capabilities are assessed. GitHub Copilot showed superior performance on easier and medium tasks, while ChatGPT excelled in memory efficiency and debugging. Codeium, though promising, struggled with more complex problems. Despite their strengths, all tools faced challenges in handling harder problems. These insights provide a deeper understanding of each tool’s capabilities and limitations, offering guidance for developers and researchers seeking to optimize AI integration in coding workflows.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-12-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/iccit64611.2024.11021727
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.12
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Benchmarking ChatGPT, Codeium, and GitHub Copilot: A Comparative Study of AI-Driven Programming and Debugging Assistants

Mohammad Masudur Rahman, Najam Anjum, Md Sultanul Islam Ovi, Tasmina Haque Bithe et al.
1 citations
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
0.12
article

Benchmarking ChatGPT, Codeium, and GitHub Copilot: A Comparative Study of AI-Driven Programming and Debugging Assistants

Mohammad Masudur Rahman, Najam Anjum, Md Sultanul Islam Ovi, Tasmina Haque Bithe, Mst. Shahnaj Akter Smrity
article en
1 citations

Abstract

With the increasing adoption of AI-driven tools in software development, large language models (LLMs) have become essential for tasks like code generation, bug fixing, and optimization. Tools like ChatGPT, GitHub Copilot, and Codeium provide valuable assistance in solving programming challenges, yet their effectiveness remains underexplored. This paper presents a comparative study of ChatGPT, Codeium, and GitHub Copilot, evaluating their performance on LeetCode problems across varying difficulty levels and categories. Key metrics such as success rates, runtime efficiency, memory usage, and error-handling capabilities are assessed. GitHub Copilot showed superior performance on easier and medium tasks, while ChatGPT excelled in memory efficiency and debugging. Codeium, though promising, struggled with more complex problems. Despite their strengths, all tools faced challenges in handling harder problems. These insights provide a deeper understanding of each tool’s capabilities and limitations, offering guidance for developers and researchers seeking to optimize AI integration in coding workflows.

George Mason University (US), Green University of Bangladesh (BD), University of Rajshahi (BD)
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
0.12
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.