Evaluating the Transfer of Information in Phase Retrieval STEM Techniques

Phase retrieval methods in scanning transmission electron microscopy ( STEM ) recover scattered phase information from far-field intensity measurements of a converged electron probe. We evaluate the performance of various phase retrieval techniques – including center-of-mass imaging ( COM ), tilt-corrected bright-field STEM ( tcBF ), and direct ptychographic methods such as single-side band ( SSB ) and Wigner distribution deconvolution ( WDD ) – under different experimental conditions. Through analytical derivation of contrast transfer functions ( CTF ) under the weak phase-object approximation and numerical validation using white-noise samples, we assess the impact of scan sampling, illumination aberrations, and detector geometries. Based on these findings, we develop a novel direct ptychographic algorithm that combines the relaxed scan-sampling advantages of tcBF while avoiding CTF zero-crossings through SSB recovery. Our analysis reveals fundamental limitations in using CTF as a performance metric and demonstrates the advantages of dose-invariant spectral signal-to-noise ratio ( SSNR ) for evaluating phase retrieval methods.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-05-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.69761/ehch7395
Primary Topic
Advanced X-ray Imaging Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating the Transfer of Information in Phase Retrieval STEM Techniques

Stephanie M. Ribet, Colin Ophus, Lewys Jones, Mary Scott et al.
Advanced X-ray Imaging Techniques
article

Evaluating the Transfer of Information in Phase Retrieval STEM Techniques

Stephanie M. Ribet, Colin Ophus, Lewys Jones, Mary Scott, Julie Marie Bekkevold, Georgios Varnavides
article en

Abstract

Phase retrieval methods in scanning transmission electron microscopy ( STEM ) recover scattered phase information from far-field intensity measurements of a converged electron probe. We evaluate the performance of various phase retrieval techniques – including center-of-mass imaging ( COM ), tilt-corrected bright-field STEM ( tcBF ), and direct ptychographic methods such as single-side band ( SSB ) and Wigner distribution deconvolution ( WDD ) – under different experimental conditions. Through analytical derivation of contrast transfer functions ( CTF ) under the weak phase-object approximation and numerical validation using white-noise samples, we assess the impact of scan sampling, illumination aberrations, and detector geometries. Based on these findings, we develop a novel direct ptychographic algorithm that combines the relaxed scan-sampling advantages of tcBF while avoiding CTF zero-crossings through SSB recovery. Our analysis reveals fundamental limitations in using CTF as a performance metric and demonstrates the advantages of dose-invariant spectral signal-to-noise ratio ( SSNR ) for evaluating phase retrieval methods.

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (US), Trinity College Dublin (IE), University of California, Berkeley (US), Stanford University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Advanced X-ray Imaging Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Evaluating the Transfer of Information in Phase Retrieval STEM Techniques — Stephanie M. Ribet, Colin Ophus, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS