Evaluating the Transfer of Information in Phase Retrieval STEM Techniques
Phase retrieval methods in scanning transmission electron microscopy ( STEM ) recover scattered phase information from far-field intensity measurements of a converged electron probe. We evaluate the performance of various phase retrieval techniques – including center-of-mass imaging ( COM ), tilt-corrected bright-field STEM ( tcBF ), and direct ptychographic methods such as single-side band ( SSB ) and Wigner distribution deconvolution ( WDD ) – under different experimental conditions. Through analytical derivation of contrast transfer functions ( CTF ) under the weak phase-object approximation and numerical validation using white-noise samples, we assess the impact of scan sampling, illumination aberrations, and detector geometries. Based on these findings, we develop a novel direct ptychographic algorithm that combines the relaxed scan-sampling advantages of tcBF while avoiding CTF zero-crossings through SSB recovery. Our analysis reveals fundamental limitations in using CTF as a performance metric and demonstrates the advantages of dose-invariant spectral signal-to-noise ratio ( SSNR ) for evaluating phase retrieval methods.
Authors
- Stephanie M. Ribet (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7117-066X)
- Colin Ophus (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2348-8558)
- Lewys Jones (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6907-0731)
- Mary Scott (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9543-6725)
- Julie Marie Bekkevold (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7591-0928)
- Georgios Varnavides (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8338-3323)
Institutions
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (US)
- Trinity College Dublin (IE)
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
- Stanford University (US)
Publication Details
- Published
- 2025-05-14
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.69761/ehch7395
- Primary Topic
- Advanced X-ray Imaging Techniques
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00