Negotiating Gender Justice in Minangkabau Marital Disputes: Between Adat, Islamic, and State Law

This study investigates the negotiation of gender justice in resolving marital disputes within the Minangkabau community, where customary (adat), Islamic, and state laws intersect. Women frequently experience injustice not only in their domestic lives but also in the resolution of household conflicts. Utilizing a socio-legal approach, this qualitative field research is based on in-depth interviews conducted through purposive snowball sampling with women who have experienced marital disputes. The findings indicate that the mechanisms through which women resolve these conflicts—whether through customary, religious, or state channels—tend to perpetuate gender injustice. Often, individual resolution is adopted as an adaptive response to a range of structural and cultural barriers that restrict their access to formal justice. However, such individualized approaches frequently result in unresolved issues, thereby exacerbating gender inequities. This study underscores the inadequate role of religious, state, and customary institutions in ensuring substantive justice for women and emphasizes the need for a more inclusive dispute resolution framework that prioritizes gender justice.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
JURIS (Jurnal Ilmiah Syariah)
Published
2025-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31958/juris.v24i1.11848
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Gender and Women's Rights
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Negotiating Gender Justice in Minangkabau Marital Disputes: Between Adat, Islamic, and State Law

Dodon Alfiander, Otong Sulaeman, Oktari Kanus, Sri Rahmi et al.
1 citations
JURIS (Jurnal Ilmiah Syariah)
Gender and Women's Rights
8.52
article

Negotiating Gender Justice in Minangkabau Marital Disputes: Between Adat, Islamic, and State Law

Dodon Alfiander, Otong Sulaeman, Oktari Kanus, Sri Rahmi, Bekti Utomo
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study investigates the negotiation of gender justice in resolving marital disputes within the Minangkabau community, where customary (adat), Islamic, and state laws intersect. Women frequently experience injustice not only in their domestic lives but also in the resolution of household conflicts. Utilizing a socio-legal approach, this qualitative field research is based on in-depth interviews conducted through purposive snowball sampling with women who have experienced marital disputes. The findings indicate that the mechanisms through which women resolve these conflicts—whether through customary, religious, or state channels—tend to perpetuate gender injustice. Often, individual resolution is adopted as an adaptive response to a range of structural and cultural barriers that restrict their access to formal justice. However, such individualized approaches frequently result in unresolved issues, thereby exacerbating gender inequities. This study underscores the inadequate role of religious, state, and customary institutions in ensuring substantive justice for women and emphasizes the need for a more inclusive dispute resolution framework that prioritizes gender justice.

JURIS (Jurnal Ilmiah Syariah)Vol. 24(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Gender and Women's Rights
8.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.