Stress Path and Orientation Effects on Natural Fiber–Reinforced Sand

Triaxial tests were conducted to investigate the effects of stress path and orientation on natural fiber–reinforced sand. Four stress paths were employed, including the conventional triaxial compression (CTC) test, reduced axial pressure triaxial extension (RTE) test, constant principal stress triaxial compression (TC) test, and reduced confining pressure triaxial compression (RTC) test. Deviator stress, volume or void ratio change, shear strength, and reinforcement ratio were analyzed for varying fiber mass contents and aspect ratios. Test results demonstrate that fiber reinforcement significantly impacts sand’s shear strength. However, its effectiveness varies across different stress paths. The reinforcement level decreases from CTC to TC and then to RTC and RTE. A stress path angle, denoted αs, was introduced to characterize the effects of stress path, with the angle inclined between the stress path line and the x-axis. This indicates that the reinforcement level generally decreases as the stress path angle increases. Additionally, fiber reinforcement provided greater shear strength under CTC conditions than under RTE conditions, highlighting the significance of stress orientation. Critical and peak values of samples’ shear strength were also studied. In CTC conditions, fiber reinforcement contributes a more considerable critical shear strength rather than the peak value. This indicates that natural fibers are particularly effective in resisting large strains of sand at compressive stress levels. In details of shear strength parameters, a theoretical framework was proposed to capture fiber reinforcement mechanisms through changes in the peak values of the friction angle and cohesion of fiber–sand mixtures. Moreover, critical values of the friction angle of fibered or bare sand decrease visibly under RTE conditions, resulting in an easier failure in unloading conditions. These findings provide valuable insights for fiber reinforcement applications in geotechnical engineering, such as ground reinforcement or desertification control.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Geomechanics
Published
2025-06-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1061/ijgnai.gmeng-10556
Primary Topic
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Stress Path and Orientation Effects on Natural Fiber–Reinforced Sand

Haotian Zheng, Yanyuan Tang, Xue-Yan Liu, Wen Liu et al.
International Journal of Geomechanics
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
article

Stress Path and Orientation Effects on Natural Fiber–Reinforced Sand

Haotian Zheng, Yanyuan Tang, Xue-Yan Liu, Wen Liu, Chao Ma, Yaming Guo
article en

Abstract

Triaxial tests were conducted to investigate the effects of stress path and orientation on natural fiber–reinforced sand. Four stress paths were employed, including the conventional triaxial compression (CTC) test, reduced axial pressure triaxial extension (RTE) test, constant principal stress triaxial compression (TC) test, and reduced confining pressure triaxial compression (RTC) test. Deviator stress, volume or void ratio change, shear strength, and reinforcement ratio were analyzed for varying fiber mass contents and aspect ratios. Test results demonstrate that fiber reinforcement significantly impacts sand’s shear strength. However, its effectiveness varies across different stress paths. The reinforcement level decreases from CTC to TC and then to RTC and RTE. A stress path angle, denoted αs, was introduced to characterize the effects of stress path, with the angle inclined between the stress path line and the x-axis. This indicates that the reinforcement level generally decreases as the stress path angle increases. Additionally, fiber reinforcement provided greater shear strength under CTC conditions than under RTE conditions, highlighting the significance of stress orientation. Critical and peak values of samples’ shear strength were also studied. In CTC conditions, fiber reinforcement contributes a more considerable critical shear strength rather than the peak value. This indicates that natural fibers are particularly effective in resisting large strains of sand at compressive stress levels. In details of shear strength parameters, a theoretical framework was proposed to capture fiber reinforcement mechanisms through changes in the peak values of the friction angle and cohesion of fiber–sand mixtures. Moreover, critical values of the friction angle of fibered or bare sand decrease visibly under RTE conditions, resulting in an easier failure in unloading conditions. These findings provide valuable insights for fiber reinforcement applications in geotechnical engineering, such as ground reinforcement or desertification control.

International Journal of GeomechanicsVol. 25(8)
Colorado School of Mines (US), Beijing Forestry University (CN), Tianjin Research Institute of Electric Science (China) (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.