Safety of Leadless Pacemaker Insertion in Nonagenarians

Increased age is associated with increased frailty and often worse postoperative outcomes. We sought to assess the safety of leadless pacemaker (LPM) insertion in the very elderly population. We queried the National Readmission Database for patients who underwent LPM insertion from 2017 to 2020. Patients aged ≥90 years were included in the nonagenarian group and compared to patients aged <90 years. Patient comorbidities were queried using the appropriate International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, codes. We compared outcomes using multivariate logistic and linear regression, adjusting for patient comorbidities. At baseline, nonagenarians had higher prevalence rates of hypertension, a history of stroke, atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, dementia, and hypothyroidism. The control group had more diabetes, coronary artery disease, chronic kidney disease, chronic pulmonary disease, oxygen use, coagulopathy, anemia, obesity, substance abuse, and chronic liver disease. Compared to controls, nonagenarians were found to have a shorter length of stay (2.5 days; <i>P</i> < .001); lower mortality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.7; <i>P</i> = .02); and lower rates of post-procedural cardiac arrest (aOR, 0.3; <i>P</i> = .03), mechanical ventilation (aOR, 0.4; <i>P</i> < .001), and vasopressor use (aOR, 0.6; <i>P</i> = .001). Nonagenarians were only found to have an increased risk of pericardial complications (tamponade, pericardiocentesis, hemopericardium) (aOR, 1.6; <i>P</i> = .02). There was no significant difference in 30-day readmissions (aOR, 0.97; <i>P</i> = .7), postoperative bleed (aOR, 0.84; <i>P</i> = .07), or stroke (aOR, 0.586; <i>P</i> = .1). Our study demonstrates that LPM insertion could be safe in the very elderly population. However, our study likely demonstrates survivorship bias, as patients in the nonagenarian group had fewer overall comorbidities. Despite adjustment for known comorbidities, there remain confounders that are difficult to account for. Age itself does not seem to be a risk factor for worse outcomes in this population.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Innovations in Cardiac Rhythm Management
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.19102/icrm.2025.16053
Primary Topic
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Safety of Leadless Pacemaker Insertion in Nonagenarians

Jobin Varghese, Michael T. Spooner, Jashan Gill, Rezwan Munshi et al.
Journal of Innovations in Cardiac Rhythm Management
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
article

Safety of Leadless Pacemaker Insertion in Nonagenarians

Jobin Varghese, Michael T. Spooner, Jashan Gill, Rezwan Munshi, Ahmad Harb
article en

Abstract

Increased age is associated with increased frailty and often worse postoperative outcomes. We sought to assess the safety of leadless pacemaker (LPM) insertion in the very elderly population. We queried the National Readmission Database for patients who underwent LPM insertion from 2017 to 2020. Patients aged ≥90 years were included in the nonagenarian group and compared to patients aged <90 years. Patient comorbidities were queried using the appropriate International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, codes. We compared outcomes using multivariate logistic and linear regression, adjusting for patient comorbidities. At baseline, nonagenarians had higher prevalence rates of hypertension, a history of stroke, atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, dementia, and hypothyroidism. The control group had more diabetes, coronary artery disease, chronic kidney disease, chronic pulmonary disease, oxygen use, coagulopathy, anemia, obesity, substance abuse, and chronic liver disease. Compared to controls, nonagenarians were found to have a shorter length of stay (2.5 days; <i>P</i> < .001); lower mortality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.7; <i>P</i> = .02); and lower rates of post-procedural cardiac arrest (aOR, 0.3; <i>P</i> = .03), mechanical ventilation (aOR, 0.4; <i>P</i> < .001), and vasopressor use (aOR, 0.6; <i>P</i> = .001). Nonagenarians were only found to have an increased risk of pericardial complications (tamponade, pericardiocentesis, hemopericardium) (aOR, 1.6; <i>P</i> = .02). There was no significant difference in 30-day readmissions (aOR, 0.97; <i>P</i> = .7), postoperative bleed (aOR, 0.84; <i>P</i> = .07), or stroke (aOR, 0.586; <i>P</i> = .1). Our study demonstrates that LPM insertion could be safe in the very elderly population. However, our study likely demonstrates survivorship bias, as patients in the nonagenarian group had fewer overall comorbidities. Despite adjustment for known comorbidities, there remain confounders that are difficult to account for. Age itself does not seem to be a risk factor for worse outcomes in this population.

Journal of Innovations in Cardiac Rhythm ManagementVol. 16(5)
Mercy Medical Center (US), Centegra Hospital McHenry (US), Northwestern Medicine (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.