Skin pH and buffering ability vary between two co-occurring semi-aquatic frog species

Amphibians face global declines linked to anthropogenic environmental change, including modifications to freshwater habitats. Human impacts on water chemistry, including acid rain and run-off of road salt into wetlands, may affect the physiology of amphibians with aquatic life stages. Specifically, water pH varies among freshwater habitats and affects amphibian development, behaviour, and physiology. For example, changes in skin pH affect the activity of enzymes on the skin, including those involved in antimicrobial functions. In this study, we explored the ability of free-ranging amphibians to maintain homeostasis across a range of naturally occurring water pH and salinity. We sampled two species of frogs at 19 wetlands around Peterborough, Ontario, measuring water pH, water salinity, and the skin pH of northern leopard frogs (<i>Lithobates pipiens</i>; <i>n</i> = 141) and green frogs (<i>Lithobates clamitans</i>; <i>n</i> = 329). We found that water pH increased with salinity, and was weakly related to the proportion of built-up habitat around wetlands. Frog skin pH was significantly associated with water pH, but both species showed a strong ability to buffer their skin pH across a range of conditions. On average, the ventral skin pH of <i>L. pipiens</i> increased by 0.37 units for each 1 unit increase in water pH, while skin pH of <i>L. clamitans</i> increased by 0.12. Specific responses to water chemistry differed between the two species: skin pH of <i>L. pipiens</i> varied with demographic group and body size, but skin pH of <i>L. clamitans</i> did not. As human effects on wetland habitats increase, these amphibians' ability to buffer skin pH may provide some protection against anthropogenic changes in wetland water chemistry.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Conservation Physiology
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/conphys/coaf037
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Amphibian and Reptile Biology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.21

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Skin pH and buffering ability vary between two co-occurring semi-aquatic frog species

Christina M. Davy, Karen J. Vanderwolf, Samuel Davison, James E. Paterson et al.
2 citations
Conservation Physiology
Amphibian and Reptile Biology
2.21
article

Skin pH and buffering ability vary between two co-occurring semi-aquatic frog species

Christina M. Davy, Karen J. Vanderwolf, Samuel Davison, James E. Paterson, April Kowalchuk-Reid, Einstein Nkwonta, Tyler Ambeau
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Amphibians face global declines linked to anthropogenic environmental change, including modifications to freshwater habitats. Human impacts on water chemistry, including acid rain and run-off of road salt into wetlands, may affect the physiology of amphibians with aquatic life stages. Specifically, water pH varies among freshwater habitats and affects amphibian development, behaviour, and physiology. For example, changes in skin pH affect the activity of enzymes on the skin, including those involved in antimicrobial functions. In this study, we explored the ability of free-ranging amphibians to maintain homeostasis across a range of naturally occurring water pH and salinity. We sampled two species of frogs at 19 wetlands around Peterborough, Ontario, measuring water pH, water salinity, and the skin pH of northern leopard frogs (<i>Lithobates pipiens</i>; <i>n</i> = 141) and green frogs (<i>Lithobates clamitans</i>; <i>n</i> = 329). We found that water pH increased with salinity, and was weakly related to the proportion of built-up habitat around wetlands. Frog skin pH was significantly associated with water pH, but both species showed a strong ability to buffer their skin pH across a range of conditions. On average, the ventral skin pH of <i>L. pipiens</i> increased by 0.37 units for each 1 unit increase in water pH, while skin pH of <i>L. clamitans</i> increased by 0.12. Specific responses to water chemistry differed between the two species: skin pH of <i>L. pipiens</i> varied with demographic group and body size, but skin pH of <i>L. clamitans</i> did not. As human effects on wetland habitats increase, these amphibians' ability to buffer skin pH may provide some protection against anthropogenic changes in wetland water chemistry.

Conservation PhysiologyVol. 13(1)
Ducks Unlimited Canada (CA), Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry (CA), University of Waterloo (CA), Trent University (CA), Carleton University (CA)
Government of Ontario, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Amphibian and Reptile Biology
2.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.