Optimizing CNN Architectures for Face Liveness Detection: Performance, Efficiency, and Generalization across Datasets

Face liveness detection is essential for securing biometric authentication systems against spoofing attacks, including printed photos, replay videos, and 3D masks. This study systematically evaluates pre-trained CNN models— DenseNet201, VGG16, InceptionV3, ResNet50, VGG19, MobileNetV2, Xception, and InceptionResNetV2—leveraging transfer learning and fine-tuning to enhance liveness detection performance. The models were trained and tested on NUAA and Replay-Attack datasets, with cross-dataset generalization validated on SiW-MV2 to assess real-world adaptability. Performance was evaluated using accuracy, precision, recall, FAR, FRR, HTER, and specialized spoof detection metrics (APCER, NPCER, ACER). Fine-tuning significantly improved detection accuracy, with DenseNet201 achieving the highest performance (98.5% on NUAA, 97.71% on Replay-Attack), while MobileNetV2 proved the most efficient model for real-time applications (latency: 15 ms, memory usage: 45 MB, energy consumption: 30 mJ). A statistical significance analysis (paired t-tests, confidence intervals) validated these improvements. Cross-dataset experiments identified DenseNet201 and MobileNetV2 as the most generalizable architectures, with DenseNet201 achieving 86.4% accuracy on Replay-Attack when trained on NUAA, demonstrating robust feature extraction and adaptability. In contrast, ResNet50 showed lower generalization capabilities, struggling with dataset variability and complex spoofing attacks. These findings suggest that MobileNetV2 is well-suited for low-power applications, while DenseNet201 is ideal for high-security environments requiring superior accuracy. This research provides a framework for improving real-time face liveness detection, enhancing biometric security, and guiding future advancements in AI-driven anti-spoofing techniques.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32604/cmes.2025.058855
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Face recognition and analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.55
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimizing CNN Architectures for Face Liveness Detection: Performance, Efficiency, and Generalization across Datasets

Sudeep D. Thepade, Abdullah Alamri, Biswajeet Pradhan, Smita Khairnar et al.
2 citations
Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences
Face recognition and analysis
2.55
article

Optimizing CNN Architectures for Face Liveness Detection: Performance, Efficiency, and Generalization across Datasets

Sudeep D. Thepade, Abdullah Alamri, Biswajeet Pradhan, Smita Khairnar, Shilpa Gite
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Face liveness detection is essential for securing biometric authentication systems against spoofing attacks, including printed photos, replay videos, and 3D masks. This study systematically evaluates pre-trained CNN models— DenseNet201, VGG16, InceptionV3, ResNet50, VGG19, MobileNetV2, Xception, and InceptionResNetV2—leveraging transfer learning and fine-tuning to enhance liveness detection performance. The models were trained and tested on NUAA and Replay-Attack datasets, with cross-dataset generalization validated on SiW-MV2 to assess real-world adaptability. Performance was evaluated using accuracy, precision, recall, FAR, FRR, HTER, and specialized spoof detection metrics (APCER, NPCER, ACER). Fine-tuning significantly improved detection accuracy, with DenseNet201 achieving the highest performance (98.5% on NUAA, 97.71% on Replay-Attack), while MobileNetV2 proved the most efficient model for real-time applications (latency: 15 ms, memory usage: 45 MB, energy consumption: 30 mJ). A statistical significance analysis (paired t-tests, confidence intervals) validated these improvements. Cross-dataset experiments identified DenseNet201 and MobileNetV2 as the most generalizable architectures, with DenseNet201 achieving 86.4% accuracy on Replay-Attack when trained on NUAA, demonstrating robust feature extraction and adaptability. In contrast, ResNet50 showed lower generalization capabilities, struggling with dataset variability and complex spoofing attacks. These findings suggest that MobileNetV2 is well-suited for low-power applications, while DenseNet201 is ideal for high-security environments requiring superior accuracy. This research provides a framework for improving real-time face liveness detection, enhancing biometric security, and guiding future advancements in AI-driven anti-spoofing techniques.

Computer Modeling in Engineering & SciencesVol. 143(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Face recognition and analysis
2.55
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.