Luigi L. Pasinetti’s structural dynamics: a methodological appraisal

Abstract Over the course of six decades, Luigi L. Pasinetti pursued an ambitious project to incorporate structural change into the analysis of economic growth. His aim was to take growth theory beyond the steady state by scrapping the unrealistic assumption of balanced growth. Yet his own framework rests on a set of highly restrictive assumptions about how technical change and the pattern of demand evolve over time. We argue that Pasinetti’s formal model is not intended as an abstract representation of an actual economy but as an anchor for rigorous but less formal investigations of the institutional arrangements necessary to maintain full employment in the face of complex structural change. We then examine the affinities between Pasinetti’s work and that of Piero Sraffa and Pierangelo Garegnani. The lesson of their work is that economic theory ought to become again what it was for the classical economists and Marx: an investigation of how institutions are formed and evolve, of how they shape, and are shaped by, the real-world dynamics of a socioeconomic system that is perpetually undergoing structural transformation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cambridge Journal of Economics
Published
2025-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/beaf026
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Architecture and Art History Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
26.93
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Luigi L. Pasinetti’s structural dynamics: a methodological appraisal

Davide Gualerzi, Gary Mongiovi
1 citations
Cambridge Journal of Economics
Architecture and Art History Studies
26.93
article

Luigi L. Pasinetti’s structural dynamics: a methodological appraisal

Davide Gualerzi, Gary Mongiovi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Over the course of six decades, Luigi L. Pasinetti pursued an ambitious project to incorporate structural change into the analysis of economic growth. His aim was to take growth theory beyond the steady state by scrapping the unrealistic assumption of balanced growth. Yet his own framework rests on a set of highly restrictive assumptions about how technical change and the pattern of demand evolve over time. We argue that Pasinetti’s formal model is not intended as an abstract representation of an actual economy but as an anchor for rigorous but less formal investigations of the institutional arrangements necessary to maintain full employment in the face of complex structural change. We then examine the affinities between Pasinetti’s work and that of Piero Sraffa and Pierangelo Garegnani. The lesson of their work is that economic theory ought to become again what it was for the classical economists and Marx: an investigation of how institutions are formed and evolve, of how they shape, and are shaped by, the real-world dynamics of a socioeconomic system that is perpetually undergoing structural transformation.

Cambridge Journal of EconomicsVol. 49(5)
University of Padua (IT), St. John's University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Architecture and Art History Studies
26.93
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Luigi L. Pasinetti’s structural dynamics: a methodological appraisal — Davide Gualerzi, Gary Mongiovi · Cambridge Journal of Economics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS