The United States in Central America in the Twenty-First Century: Cursed by the Asymmetry of Power?

Abstract This article examines US engagement with El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, and Nicaragua during the twenty-first century through the lens of Womack’s asymmetry theory, arguing that the US’s interactions with these weaker neighbors reveal the limitations of its power. By integrating the role of internal actors within weaker states, this study extends Womack’s theory, offering new insights into how asymmetrical power dynamics constrain both dominant and subordinate states. The article demonstrates how these dynamics result in inconsistent US policies characterized by cycles of neglect and crisis-driven interventions. This inconsistency, combined with stereotyped perceptions of regional actors, has ultimately empowered Central American elites while marginalizing other potential agents of change, raising important considerations for future US foreign policy and its practical implications in the region.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Studies Perspectives
Published
2025-05-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/isp/ekaf009
Primary Topic
International Relations and Foreign Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The United States in Central America in the Twenty-First Century: Cursed by the Asymmetry of Power?

Ieva Giedraitytė
International Studies Perspectives
International Relations and Foreign Policy
article

The United States in Central America in the Twenty-First Century: Cursed by the Asymmetry of Power?

Ieva Giedraitytė
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article examines US engagement with El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, and Nicaragua during the twenty-first century through the lens of Womack’s asymmetry theory, arguing that the US’s interactions with these weaker neighbors reveal the limitations of its power. By integrating the role of internal actors within weaker states, this study extends Womack’s theory, offering new insights into how asymmetrical power dynamics constrain both dominant and subordinate states. The article demonstrates how these dynamics result in inconsistent US policies characterized by cycles of neglect and crisis-driven interventions. This inconsistency, combined with stereotyped perceptions of regional actors, has ultimately empowered Central American elites while marginalizing other potential agents of change, raising important considerations for future US foreign policy and its practical implications in the region.

International Studies PerspectivesVol. 26(4)
Vilnius University (LT)
University of San Diego
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
International Relations and Foreign Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.