All‐Level Versus Alternative‐Level in Unilateral Laminoplasty: A Retrospective Comparative Study
Both all-level and alternative-level fixation methods effectively support the lamina and prevent reclosure, with significant improvement in clinical symptoms in both groups at the final follow-up, showing no significant difference in postoperative clinical outcomes between the two. There are no differences in sagittal parameters. All-level fixation method showed better preservation of the spinal canal diameter.
Authors
- Haiying Liu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0001-4972-8719)
- Zhenqi Zhu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7441-1433)
- Yan Liang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5512-4030)
- Bin Zheng (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6001-3071)
Institutions
- Peking University (CN)
- Peking University People's Hospital (CN)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Orthopaedic Surgery
- Published
- 2025-06-08
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1111/os.70100
- Primary Topic
- Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- Peking University
- Peking University People's Hospital