Evaluation of the Necessity of Nasogastric Tube in Gastric Surgery: A Comparative Study in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Bangladesh

Background: The routine use of nasogastric (NG) tubes in gastric surgery remains controversial. Although NG tubes are traditionally employed to prevent postoperative complications, their necessity has been questioned due to potential discomfort and adverse effects. This study aimed to assess the necessity of NG tube placement by comparing postoperative outcomes between patients with NG tubes (intubated) and those without (tubeless). Methods: This quasi-experimental study was conducted at the Department of General Surgery, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University (BSMMU), Bangladesh, from October 2023 to September 2024. A total of 60 patients who underwent gastric surgery for malignant and benign conditions were enrolled and randomly assigned to two groups: Group I (intubated, n=30) and Group II (tubeless, n=30). All patients received epidural pain control. Key parameters included preoperative serum albumin levels, postoperative complications, time to passage of stools, time to first oral feeding, length of hospital stay, and hospitalization costs. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 22.0. Results: Group I (intubated) had significantly longer times for bowel sound return (88.01 ± 20.17 hours vs. 76.5 ± 21.87 hours, p = 0.038), bowel movement (119.28 ± 23.81 hours vs. 95.07 ± 25.67 hours, p = 0.004), and oral resumption (118 ± 24.27 hours vs. 105.52 ± 22.99 hours, p = 0.045). Pulmonary complications were more common in Group I (33.3%) than in Group II (3.3%, p = 0.002). The mean hospital stay was shorter in Group II (7.76 ± 1.98 days) compared to Group I (9.55 ± 2.19 days, p = 0.001). Conclusion: The study demonstrates that omitting nasogastric tubes in gastric surgery results in faster recovery, fewer complications, and reduced hospital stay. These findings suggest a tubeless approach may be advantageous, particularly in improving recovery times and minimizing pulmonary complications.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Health Informatics
Published
2025-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.63682/fhi2102
Primary Topic
Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of the Necessity of Nasogastric Tube in Gastric Surgery: A Comparative Study in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Bangladesh

Mohammad Faroque Eastiak, M. J. Hossain, Chittaranjan Das, Shaheen Faizi et al.
Frontiers in Health Informatics
Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
article

Evaluation of the Necessity of Nasogastric Tube in Gastric Surgery: A Comparative Study in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Bangladesh

Mohammad Faroque Eastiak, M. J. Hossain, Chittaranjan Das, Shaheen Faizi, Mohammad Salim, Md Saiful Islam, Rana Jahangir Alam, Mohammad Ziaur Rahman
article en

Abstract

Background: The routine use of nasogastric (NG) tubes in gastric surgery remains controversial. Although NG tubes are traditionally employed to prevent postoperative complications, their necessity has been questioned due to potential discomfort and adverse effects. This study aimed to assess the necessity of NG tube placement by comparing postoperative outcomes between patients with NG tubes (intubated) and those without (tubeless). Methods: This quasi-experimental study was conducted at the Department of General Surgery, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University (BSMMU), Bangladesh, from October 2023 to September 2024. A total of 60 patients who underwent gastric surgery for malignant and benign conditions were enrolled and randomly assigned to two groups: Group I (intubated, n=30) and Group II (tubeless, n=30). All patients received epidural pain control. Key parameters included preoperative serum albumin levels, postoperative complications, time to passage of stools, time to first oral feeding, length of hospital stay, and hospitalization costs. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 22.0. Results: Group I (intubated) had significantly longer times for bowel sound return (88.01 ± 20.17 hours vs. 76.5 ± 21.87 hours, p = 0.038), bowel movement (119.28 ± 23.81 hours vs. 95.07 ± 25.67 hours, p = 0.004), and oral resumption (118 ± 24.27 hours vs. 105.52 ± 22.99 hours, p = 0.045). Pulmonary complications were more common in Group I (33.3%) than in Group II (3.3%, p = 0.002). The mean hospital stay was shorter in Group II (7.76 ± 1.98 days) compared to Group I (9.55 ± 2.19 days, p = 0.001). Conclusion: The study demonstrates that omitting nasogastric tubes in gastric surgery results in faster recovery, fewer complications, and reduced hospital stay. These findings suggest a tubeless approach may be advantageous, particularly in improving recovery times and minimizing pulmonary complications.

Frontiers in Health Informatics
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.