Scaling Exponents of Turbulent Static Pressure Structure Function in the Inertial Subrange

Abstract The measured variations in the turbulent static pressure structure function with scale in the roughness sublayer above a subarctic forest are empirically shown to exhibit exponents that are smaller than predicted for the inertial subrange (ISR). Three hypotheses are offered to explain these deviations. The first is based on conventional intermittency correction to the averaged turbulent kinetic energy dissipation rate, the second is based on shearing introducing deviations from locally isotropic state that must be sensed by both velocity and pressure structure functions, and the third is based on large and inertial scale pressure interactions that persist at values of within the resolvable ISR. The third hypothesis is shown to yield superior results, which allows a new formulation for to be derived that accommodates such finite interactions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geophysical Research Letters
Published
2025-06-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2025gl116176
Primary Topic
Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Scaling Exponents of Turbulent Static Pressure Structure Function in the Inertial Subrange

Gabriel G. Katul, Mika Aurela, Toprak Aslan
Geophysical Research Letters
Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
article

Scaling Exponents of Turbulent Static Pressure Structure Function in the Inertial Subrange

Gabriel G. Katul, Mika Aurela, Toprak Aslan
article en

Abstract

Abstract The measured variations in the turbulent static pressure structure function with scale in the roughness sublayer above a subarctic forest are empirically shown to exhibit exponents that are smaller than predicted for the inertial subrange (ISR). Three hypotheses are offered to explain these deviations. The first is based on conventional intermittency correction to the averaged turbulent kinetic energy dissipation rate, the second is based on shearing introducing deviations from locally isotropic state that must be sensed by both velocity and pressure structure functions, and the third is based on large and inertial scale pressure interactions that persist at values of within the resolvable ISR. The third hypothesis is shown to yield superior results, which allows a new formulation for to be derived that accommodates such finite interactions.

Geophysical Research LettersVol. 52(11)
Finnish Meteorological Institute (FI), Duke University (US)
National Science Foundation, U.S. Department of Energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.