AI-Driven Policy Testing for Mental Health Crisis Response: An Agent-Based Modelling and Reinforcement Learning Approach

This study introduces a novel simulation-based framework that integrates Agent-Based Modelling (ABM) with Reinforcement Learning (RL) to evaluate and optimize policies for mental health crisis response.As mental health crises become increasingly complex and context-specific, traditional fixed-resource strategies may fail to adapt to evolving population needs.To address this, we simulate a diverse synthetic population characterized by varying demographic attributes such as age and gender, as well as factors like baseline mental health, stress exposure, social support, and access to care.Agents evolve over time based on stochastic stressors and receive interventions through three modelled resource types: hotlines, counselling services, and emergency care.We compare four policy strategies: hotline-only, counselling-only, a mixed-resource approach, and a PPO-trained RL policy designed to dynamically allocate resources based on real-time population states.Each strategy is simulated over a 100-day period.Key evaluation metrics include crisis rate, intervention coverage, unmet need rate, average stress level, total interventions, and a Policy Efficiency Score (PES).Spatial resource usage and demographic subgroup outcomes are also tracked and analysed.Our results reveal that counselling-focused strategies offer the most sustainable balance of low crisis rates and stress levels with moderate intervention coverage.While the RL-optimized policy achieves 100% intervention coverage and zero unmet needs, it also maintains the highest average stress, suggesting an over-saturation of interventions without long-term mental health relief.The findings underscore the importance of not only maximizing access but also prioritizing effective and sustainable care.This framework serves as a decision-support tool to guide public health resource allocation and policy design in crisis settings.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
OALib
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1113507
Primary Topic
COVID-19 epidemiological studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI-Driven Policy Testing for Mental Health Crisis Response: An Agent-Based Modelling and Reinforcement Learning Approach

Rocco de Filippis, Abdullah Al Foysal
OALib
COVID-19 epidemiological studies
article

AI-Driven Policy Testing for Mental Health Crisis Response: An Agent-Based Modelling and Reinforcement Learning Approach

Rocco de Filippis, Abdullah Al Foysal
article en

Abstract

This study introduces a novel simulation-based framework that integrates Agent-Based Modelling (ABM) with Reinforcement Learning (RL) to evaluate and optimize policies for mental health crisis response.As mental health crises become increasingly complex and context-specific, traditional fixed-resource strategies may fail to adapt to evolving population needs.To address this, we simulate a diverse synthetic population characterized by varying demographic attributes such as age and gender, as well as factors like baseline mental health, stress exposure, social support, and access to care.Agents evolve over time based on stochastic stressors and receive interventions through three modelled resource types: hotlines, counselling services, and emergency care.We compare four policy strategies: hotline-only, counselling-only, a mixed-resource approach, and a PPO-trained RL policy designed to dynamically allocate resources based on real-time population states.Each strategy is simulated over a 100-day period.Key evaluation metrics include crisis rate, intervention coverage, unmet need rate, average stress level, total interventions, and a Policy Efficiency Score (PES).Spatial resource usage and demographic subgroup outcomes are also tracked and analysed.Our results reveal that counselling-focused strategies offer the most sustainable balance of low crisis rates and stress levels with moderate intervention coverage.While the RL-optimized policy achieves 100% intervention coverage and zero unmet needs, it also maintains the highest average stress, suggesting an over-saturation of interventions without long-term mental health relief.The findings underscore the importance of not only maximizing access but also prioritizing effective and sustainable care.This framework serves as a decision-support tool to guide public health resource allocation and policy design in crisis settings.

OALibVol. 12(06)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
COVID-19 epidemiological studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.