The Shift in Sport Discourse during the Trump Era and Policy Challenges for South Korean Sport

Objectives This study explores how the Trump administration politicized sport as a tool for domestic nationalism and international diplomacy, and examines its impact on South Korea’s middle-power sports diplomacy. Methods Using case study analysis, the research investigates key events—NFL protests, the 2018 PyeongChang Olympics, NBA-China tensions, and athlete activism. These are interpreted through soft power, cultural diplomacy, and sports nationalism frameworks. Results The study finds that the Trump administration utilized sport as a domestic political tool, reinforcing nationalist sentiment and framing athlete activism as unpatriotic. This politicized approach reflected a shift away from soft power diplomacy toward confrontational symbolism. In contrast, middle powers like South Korea have approached sports diplomacy as a means of fostering dialogue, promoting international norms, and enhancing global cooperation, highlighting a strategic divergence in the use of sport in foreign policy. Conclusions The politicization of sport under Trump presents both challenges and opportunities for South Korea. To respond, Korea must strengthen sports diplomacy rooted in neutrality, human rights, and multilateral cooperation, especially amid a shifting global order.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Sport and Dance Science
Published
2025-05-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54109/jsds.2025.5.2.3
Primary Topic
Sports, Gender, and Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Shift in Sport Discourse during the Trump Era and Policy Challenges for South Korean Sport

Diane Lee
Journal of Sport and Dance Science
Sports, Gender, and Society
article

The Shift in Sport Discourse during the Trump Era and Policy Challenges for South Korean Sport

Diane Lee
article en

Abstract

Objectives This study explores how the Trump administration politicized sport as a tool for domestic nationalism and international diplomacy, and examines its impact on South Korea’s middle-power sports diplomacy. Methods Using case study analysis, the research investigates key events—NFL protests, the 2018 PyeongChang Olympics, NBA-China tensions, and athlete activism. These are interpreted through soft power, cultural diplomacy, and sports nationalism frameworks. Results The study finds that the Trump administration utilized sport as a domestic political tool, reinforcing nationalist sentiment and framing athlete activism as unpatriotic. This politicized approach reflected a shift away from soft power diplomacy toward confrontational symbolism. In contrast, middle powers like South Korea have approached sports diplomacy as a means of fostering dialogue, promoting international norms, and enhancing global cooperation, highlighting a strategic divergence in the use of sport in foreign policy. Conclusions The politicization of sport under Trump presents both challenges and opportunities for South Korea. To respond, Korea must strengthen sports diplomacy rooted in neutrality, human rights, and multilateral cooperation, especially amid a shifting global order.

Journal of Sport and Dance ScienceVol. 5(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Sports, Gender, and Society
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Shift in Sport Discourse during the Trump Era and Policy Challenges for South Korean Sport — Diane Lee · Journal of Sport and Dance Science (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS