Negotiations without Intermediaries: Post-Conflict Settlement between Azerbaijan and Armenia

The article deals with the key events and relations between Azerbaijan and Armenia in the first year of the post-conflict period . Special attention is turned to importance of bilateral negotiations leading to a “peace agreement”. Experts view the exclusion of mediators from the conflict resolution process in different ways. Some talk about serious risks that the bilateral format poses for Yerevan, as the loser and therefore obviously the weaker side. Others see in this format a significant potential for settlement, as the intervention of mediators (OSCE Minsk Group Co-Chairs) has already shown its inefficiency. Such interference in the negotiation process will inevitably lead to introduction of an agenda that does not correspond to the goals and objectives of a peaceful settlement, and can push the parties towards a new confrontation. Formal non-participation of intermediaries in negotiations does not mean that there is no indirect influence of the third parties on the settlement process. Therefore, post-conflict cooperation between Azerbaijan and Armenia in the medium term contains multidirectional trends. Possibility of a settlement within the framework of bilateral cooperation between Baku and Yerevan still remains.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Russia and New States of Eurasia
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.20542/2073-4786-2025-1-41-63
Primary Topic
Post-Soviet Geopolitical Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Negotiations without Intermediaries: Post-Conflict Settlement between Azerbaijan and Armenia

Zoya U. Makhmudova
Russia and New States of Eurasia
Post-Soviet Geopolitical Dynamics
article

Negotiations without Intermediaries: Post-Conflict Settlement between Azerbaijan and Armenia

Zoya U. Makhmudova
article en

Abstract

The article deals with the key events and relations between Azerbaijan and Armenia in the first year of the post-conflict period . Special attention is turned to importance of bilateral negotiations leading to a “peace agreement”. Experts view the exclusion of mediators from the conflict resolution process in different ways. Some talk about serious risks that the bilateral format poses for Yerevan, as the loser and therefore obviously the weaker side. Others see in this format a significant potential for settlement, as the intervention of mediators (OSCE Minsk Group Co-Chairs) has already shown its inefficiency. Such interference in the negotiation process will inevitably lead to introduction of an agenda that does not correspond to the goals and objectives of a peaceful settlement, and can push the parties towards a new confrontation. Formal non-participation of intermediaries in negotiations does not mean that there is no indirect influence of the third parties on the settlement process. Therefore, post-conflict cooperation between Azerbaijan and Armenia in the medium term contains multidirectional trends. Possibility of a settlement within the framework of bilateral cooperation between Baku and Yerevan still remains.

Russia and New States of Eurasia(1)
Institute of World Economy and International Relations (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Post-Soviet Geopolitical Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Negotiations without Intermediaries: Post-Conflict Settlement between Azerbaijan and Armenia — Zoya U. Makhmudova · Russia and New States of Eurasia (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS