Comparison of Dexmedetomidine and Dexamethasone for Prevention of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting after Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.

Introduction: Effective perioperative analgesia and hemodynamic stability are crucial for surgical outcomes. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of dexmedetomidine and paracetamol in managing intraoperative hemodynamics, postoperative pain, sedation, and opioid consumption.Methodology: A total of 160 surgical patients were randomly assigned to either the Paracetamol group (Group P, n=80) or Dexmedetomidine group (Group D, n=80). Demographic and clinical parameters were recorded. Hemodynamic variables (HR, SBP, DBP, MAP) were monitored intraoperatively and up to 24 hours postoperatively. Pain was assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), sedation using the Sedation Scale (SS), and opioid consumption (fentanyl) was recorded. Statistical analysis was performed to compare outcomes between the groups.Results: Baseline demographics were comparable between groups (p > 0.05). Intraoperatively, Group D showed significantly lower heart rate and blood pressure at all time points. Postoperatively, Group D maintained lower HR and MAP values up to 24 hours. VAS scores were significantly lower in Group D at 4h, 8h, 16h, and 24h (p < 0.001), indicating superior analgesia. Sedation scores were higher in Group D (p < 0.001). Fentanyl consumption was significantly reduced in Group D both intraoperatively (80.3 ± 12.5 vs. 120.5 ± 15.2 mcg) and postoperatively (50.7 ± 10.2 vs. 90.6 ± 14.8 mcg), with longer time to first rescue analgesia (78.9 ± 7.3 vs. 45.2 ± 5.8 min, p < 0.001). Group D also had lower incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (15% vs. 22%, p = 0.045) and shorter PACU stay (48.2 ± 6.5 vs. 55.6 ± 7.9 min, p = 0.032).Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine provided better intraoperative hemodynamic control, enhanced postoperative analgesia and sedation, and reduced fentanyl requirements compared to paracetamol. It also improved recovery outcomes with less nausea and shorter PACU duration. Dexmedetomidine may be a more effective option for perioperative management in surgical patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physical Education Health and Social Sciences
Published
2025-05-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.63163/jpehss.v3i2.435
Primary Topic
Nausea and vomiting management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Dexmedetomidine and Dexamethasone for Prevention of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting after Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.

Fazal Karim, M K Javaid, Muhammad Arsalan Khan, Maheen Najeeb et al.
Physical Education Health and Social Sciences
Nausea and vomiting management
article

Comparison of Dexmedetomidine and Dexamethasone for Prevention of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting after Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.

Fazal Karim, M K Javaid, Muhammad Arsalan Khan, Maheen Najeeb, Emad Gohar, Mehwish
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Effective perioperative analgesia and hemodynamic stability are crucial for surgical outcomes. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of dexmedetomidine and paracetamol in managing intraoperative hemodynamics, postoperative pain, sedation, and opioid consumption.Methodology: A total of 160 surgical patients were randomly assigned to either the Paracetamol group (Group P, n=80) or Dexmedetomidine group (Group D, n=80). Demographic and clinical parameters were recorded. Hemodynamic variables (HR, SBP, DBP, MAP) were monitored intraoperatively and up to 24 hours postoperatively. Pain was assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), sedation using the Sedation Scale (SS), and opioid consumption (fentanyl) was recorded. Statistical analysis was performed to compare outcomes between the groups.Results: Baseline demographics were comparable between groups (p > 0.05). Intraoperatively, Group D showed significantly lower heart rate and blood pressure at all time points. Postoperatively, Group D maintained lower HR and MAP values up to 24 hours. VAS scores were significantly lower in Group D at 4h, 8h, 16h, and 24h (p < 0.001), indicating superior analgesia. Sedation scores were higher in Group D (p < 0.001). Fentanyl consumption was significantly reduced in Group D both intraoperatively (80.3 ± 12.5 vs. 120.5 ± 15.2 mcg) and postoperatively (50.7 ± 10.2 vs. 90.6 ± 14.8 mcg), with longer time to first rescue analgesia (78.9 ± 7.3 vs. 45.2 ± 5.8 min, p < 0.001). Group D also had lower incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (15% vs. 22%, p = 0.045) and shorter PACU stay (48.2 ± 6.5 vs. 55.6 ± 7.9 min, p = 0.032).Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine provided better intraoperative hemodynamic control, enhanced postoperative analgesia and sedation, and reduced fentanyl requirements compared to paracetamol. It also improved recovery outcomes with less nausea and shorter PACU duration. Dexmedetomidine may be a more effective option for perioperative management in surgical patients.

Physical Education Health and Social SciencesVol. 3(2)
Sarhad University of Science and Information Technology (PK), Green University of Bangladesh (BD), Northwest General Hospital and Research Center (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Nausea and vomiting management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.