Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate vs single-port transvesical enucleation of the prostate: Single-center comparative surgical outcomes during early adoption
Both HoLEP and STEP can be safely implemented for the minimally invasive treatment of BPH. Each of the procedures presents some appealing features that can be tailored to different subgroups of patients. HoLEP is appealing for higher surgical risk patients, while STEP allows to effectively manage larger glands even at the beginning of the surgeon's learning curve. As experience with SP robotic surgery matures, it is likely that STEP becomes a competitive alternative to the well-established HoLEP.
Authors
- Morgan Sturgis (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1164-1121)
- Arianna Biasatti
- Srinivas Vourganti (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4395-8433)
- Fabio Maria Valenzi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0005-5830-0975)
- Oren Feldman-Schultz
- Angelo Orsini (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0009-9372-5847)
- Kyle Dymanus (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5645-9166)
- Shaan Setia (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3798-5208)
- Riccardo Autorino
Institutions
- Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Editor-in-Chief s Voice List of Authors is an Important Element in a Scientific Publication
- Published
- 2025-01-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2025.0060
- Primary Topic
- Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00