3. P values, power, and medical significance for credible results

Type I and Type II errors are inherent in any empirical medical research on an antecedent-outcome relationship when it is based on a dataset of a sample of subjects. Type I error is the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, and its probability in a study is the P value. This error is more serious and is kept under control by specifying a cap called the level of significance. The complement of the probability of Type II error, called power, is the probability of not missing a medically significant effect when present. This article concisely explains P values, power, and medical significance in nontechnical terms for our medical colleagues and their implications for assessing the credibility of medical research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Postgraduate Medicine
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/jpgm.jpgm_30_25
Primary Topic
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

3. P values, power, and medical significance for credible results

Abhaya Indrayan
Journal of Postgraduate Medicine
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
article

3. P values, power, and medical significance for credible results

Abhaya Indrayan
article en

Abstract

Type I and Type II errors are inherent in any empirical medical research on an antecedent-outcome relationship when it is based on a dataset of a sample of subjects. Type I error is the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, and its probability in a study is the P value. This error is more serious and is kept under control by specifying a cap called the level of significance. The complement of the probability of Type II error, called power, is the probability of not missing a medically significant effect when present. This article concisely explains P values, power, and medical significance in nontechnical terms for our medical colleagues and their implications for assessing the credibility of medical research.

Journal of Postgraduate MedicineVol. 71(2)
Max Healthcare (IN)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.