Infliximab Pharmacokinetics, Dosing, and Response in Hospitalized Patients with COVID‐19 Pneumonia: A Secondary Analysis of a Multinational Randomized Clinical Trial (ACTIV‐1 IM)
Infliximab may play an important role in reducing mortality in severe COVID-19, though optimal dosing is unknown. This secondary analysis of the ACTIV-1 IM trial characterized infliximab pharmacokinetics and outcomes in patients hospitalized with severe COVID-19. ACTIV-1 IM included patients admitted with COVID-19 pneumonia who received infliximab in addition to routine care. Infliximab was administered as a single 5-mg/kg intravenous dose. The primary exposure variable was predicted infliximab concentrations over 28 days (AUC<sub>0-28</sub>). Logistic regression modeling was used to relate AUC<sub>0-28</sub> to the primary outcome of 28-day mortality, adjusted for age. The relationship between AUC<sub>0-28</sub> and the secondary outcome of time to recovery was evaluated using a Fine-Gray model, adjusted for age, with death as a competing risk. AUC<sub>0-28</sub> was higher in patients who did not die versus those who died, with a median (range) of 20,681 mg h/L (8379-60,322) versus 17,392 (9543-43,145), P < .001. A 5000-unit increase in AUC<sub>0-28</sub> was associated with decreased mortality (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.43-0.88, P = .008) and decreased composite safety events (OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.45-0.71, P < .001). Higher AUC<sub>0-28</sub> was associated with a greater probability of recovery; an AUC<sub>0-28</sub> ≤ 17,400 mg h/L was associated with a 3.45-fold higher (95% CI 2.23-5.34) probability of recovery at Day 28, as was an AUC<sub>0-28</sub> >17,400 mg h/L, albeit at a lower rate (1.18-fold higher [95% CI 1.07-1.32]), P < .002 for both. Overall, 113/390 (29.0%) patients did not achieve an optimal predicted infliximab AUC<sub>0-28</sub> of at least 17,400 mg h/L, particularly those <100 kg and those with the highest baseline disease severity.
Authors
- Christopher John Lindsell (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3297-2811)
- Stephen J. Balevic (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4016-1680)
- Richard M. W. Hoetelmans (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5582-3627)
- William G. Powderly (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7808-3086)
- Matthew W. McCarthy (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3453-935X)
- P. Brian Smith (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9330-3048)
- Andreas Schmid (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4054-1971)
- Christoph P. Hornik (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7056-8759)
- Linda K. Shaw (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5011-4805)
- Ashley Kang
- Sam Bozzette
- Daniel K. Benjamin
Institutions
- Hackensack University Medical Center (US)
- Duke University (US)
- Washington University in St. Louis (US)
- Cornell University (US)
- Clinical Research Institute (US)
- University of Kansas Medical Center (US)
- National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (US)
- Weill Cornell Medicine (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
- Published
- 2025-06-09
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1002/jcph.70057
- Citations
- 2
- Primary Topic
- SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 2.79
Funders
- Duke Clinical Research Institute