Infliximab Pharmacokinetics, Dosing, and Response in Hospitalized Patients with COVID‐19 Pneumonia: A Secondary Analysis of a Multinational Randomized Clinical Trial (ACTIV‐1 IM)

Infliximab may play an important role in reducing mortality in severe COVID-19, though optimal dosing is unknown. This secondary analysis of the ACTIV-1 IM trial characterized infliximab pharmacokinetics and outcomes in patients hospitalized with severe COVID-19. ACTIV-1 IM included patients admitted with COVID-19 pneumonia who received infliximab in addition to routine care. Infliximab was administered as a single 5-mg/kg intravenous dose. The primary exposure variable was predicted infliximab concentrations over 28 days (AUC<sub>0-28</sub>). Logistic regression modeling was used to relate AUC<sub>0-28</sub> to the primary outcome of 28-day mortality, adjusted for age. The relationship between AUC<sub>0-28</sub> and the secondary outcome of time to recovery was evaluated using a Fine-Gray model, adjusted for age, with death as a competing risk. AUC<sub>0-28</sub> was higher in patients who did not die versus those who died, with a median (range) of 20,681 mg h/L (8379-60,322) versus 17,392 (9543-43,145), P < .001. A 5000-unit increase in AUC<sub>0-28</sub> was associated with decreased mortality (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.43-0.88, P = .008) and decreased composite safety events (OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.45-0.71, P < .001). Higher AUC<sub>0-28</sub> was associated with a greater probability of recovery; an AUC<sub>0-28</sub> ≤ 17,400 mg h/L was associated with a 3.45-fold higher (95% CI 2.23-5.34) probability of recovery at Day 28, as was an AUC<sub>0-28</sub> >17,400 mg h/L, albeit at a lower rate (1.18-fold higher [95% CI 1.07-1.32]), P < .002 for both. Overall, 113/390 (29.0%) patients did not achieve an optimal predicted infliximab AUC<sub>0-28</sub> of at least 17,400 mg h/L, particularly those <100 kg and those with the highest baseline disease severity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Published
2025-06-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jcph.70057
Citations
2
Primary Topic
SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.79

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Infliximab Pharmacokinetics, Dosing, and Response in Hospitalized Patients with COVID‐19 Pneumonia: A Secondary Analysis of a Multinational Randomized Clinical Trial (ACTIV‐1 IM)

Christopher John Lindsell, Stephen J. Balevic, Richard M. W. Hoetelmans, William G. Powderly et al.
2 citations
The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
2.79
article

Infliximab Pharmacokinetics, Dosing, and Response in Hospitalized Patients with COVID‐19 Pneumonia: A Secondary Analysis of a Multinational Randomized Clinical Trial (ACTIV‐1 IM)

Christopher John Lindsell, Stephen J. Balevic, Richard M. W. Hoetelmans, William G. Powderly, Matthew W. McCarthy, P. Brian Smith, Andreas Schmid, Christoph P. Hornik, Linda K. Shaw, Ashley Kang, Sam Bozzette, Daniel K. Benjamin
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Infliximab may play an important role in reducing mortality in severe COVID-19, though optimal dosing is unknown. This secondary analysis of the ACTIV-1 IM trial characterized infliximab pharmacokinetics and outcomes in patients hospitalized with severe COVID-19. ACTIV-1 IM included patients admitted with COVID-19 pneumonia who received infliximab in addition to routine care. Infliximab was administered as a single 5-mg/kg intravenous dose. The primary exposure variable was predicted infliximab concentrations over 28 days (AUC<sub>0-28</sub>). Logistic regression modeling was used to relate AUC<sub>0-28</sub> to the primary outcome of 28-day mortality, adjusted for age. The relationship between AUC<sub>0-28</sub> and the secondary outcome of time to recovery was evaluated using a Fine-Gray model, adjusted for age, with death as a competing risk. AUC<sub>0-28</sub> was higher in patients who did not die versus those who died, with a median (range) of 20,681 mg h/L (8379-60,322) versus 17,392 (9543-43,145), P < .001. A 5000-unit increase in AUC<sub>0-28</sub> was associated with decreased mortality (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.43-0.88, P = .008) and decreased composite safety events (OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.45-0.71, P < .001). Higher AUC<sub>0-28</sub> was associated with a greater probability of recovery; an AUC<sub>0-28</sub> ≤ 17,400 mg h/L was associated with a 3.45-fold higher (95% CI 2.23-5.34) probability of recovery at Day 28, as was an AUC<sub>0-28</sub> >17,400 mg h/L, albeit at a lower rate (1.18-fold higher [95% CI 1.07-1.32]), P < .002 for both. Overall, 113/390 (29.0%) patients did not achieve an optimal predicted infliximab AUC<sub>0-28</sub> of at least 17,400 mg h/L, particularly those <100 kg and those with the highest baseline disease severity.

The Journal of Clinical PharmacologyVol. 65(11)
Hackensack University Medical Center (US), Duke University (US), Washington University in St. Louis (US), Cornell University (US), Clinical Research Institute (US), University of Kansas Medical Center (US), National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (US), Weill Cornell Medicine (US)
Duke Clinical Research Institute
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
2.79
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.