Fixed Effects, Lagged Dependent Variables, and Bracketing: Cautionary Remarks

Abstract We investigate a bracketing property that purports to yield upper- and lower bounds on the treatment effects obtained from a fixed effects (FE) and lagged dependent variable (LDV) model. Referencing both analytical results and a Monte Carlo simulation, we explore the conditions under which the bracketing property holds, confirming this to be the case when the data generating process (DGP) is characterized by either unobserved heterogeneity or feedback effects from a lagged dependent variable. However, when the DGP is characterized by both features simultaneously, we find that bracketing of the treatment effect only holds under certain conditions—but not in general. Practitioners can nevertheless obtain the lower bound estimate by referencing a model that includes both FE and an LDV. While the Nickell bias in the coefficient of the LDV is known to be of order $1/T$ , we show that the Nickell-type bias in the estimator of the treatment effect is of order $1/T^2$ .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Political Analysis
Published
2025-06-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/pan.2025.10002
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.89

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fixed Effects, Lagged Dependent Variables, and Bracketing: Cautionary Remarks

Manuel Frondel, Matei Demetrescu, Lukas Tomberg, Colin Vance
3 citations
Political Analysis
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
7.89
article

Fixed Effects, Lagged Dependent Variables, and Bracketing: Cautionary Remarks

Manuel Frondel, Matei Demetrescu, Lukas Tomberg, Colin Vance
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract We investigate a bracketing property that purports to yield upper- and lower bounds on the treatment effects obtained from a fixed effects (FE) and lagged dependent variable (LDV) model. Referencing both analytical results and a Monte Carlo simulation, we explore the conditions under which the bracketing property holds, confirming this to be the case when the data generating process (DGP) is characterized by either unobserved heterogeneity or feedback effects from a lagged dependent variable. However, when the DGP is characterized by both features simultaneously, we find that bracketing of the treatment effect only holds under certain conditions—but not in general. Practitioners can nevertheless obtain the lower bound estimate by referencing a model that includes both FE and an LDV. While the Nickell bias in the coefficient of the LDV is known to be of order $1/T$ , we show that the Nickell-type bias in the estimator of the treatment effect is of order $1/T^2$ .

Political AnalysisVol. 33(4)
RWI – Leibniz Institute for Economic Research (DE), Hochschule Bremen (DE), University of Bremen (DE), Constructor University (DE), TU Dortmund University (DE), University Hospitals of the Ruhr-University of Bochum (DE), Bochum University of Applied Sciences (DE), Ruhr University Bochum (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
7.89
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Fixed Effects, Lagged Dependent Variables, and Bracketing: Cautionary Remarks — Manuel Frondel, Matei Demetrescu, et al. · Political Analysis (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS