Cost effectiveness of mosunetuzumab and CAR-T cell therapy in relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma

T cell redirecting therapies, including mosunetuzumab (mosun), axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel), and tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel), are FDA-approved for relapsed refractory follicular lymphoma (FL) in the 3rd line and beyond. There's no head-to-head clinical trial data to compare their effectiveness. These products differ in administration, hospitalization requirements, and toxicity profiles, impacting therapy selection. We developed a Markov model spanning one to 10 years from a US payer perspective, using parameters from clinical trials, quality utilities, and billing costs. Our base case analysis over 10 years showed that mosun provided $67,654 more Net Monetary Benefit (NMB) per patient than axi-cel and $111,709 more than tisa-cel. These findings suggest mosun is cost-effective at a $150,000 willingness-to-pay per QALY.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Leukemia & lymphoma/Leukemia and lymphoma
Published
2025-06-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/10428194.2025.2506498
Primary Topic
CAR-T cell therapy research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cost effectiveness of mosunetuzumab and CAR-T cell therapy in relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma

Dahlia Sano, Meng-Hsuan Lin, Victoria Nachar, David W. Hutton et al.
Leukemia & lymphoma/Leukemia and lymphoma
CAR-T cell therapy research
article

Cost effectiveness of mosunetuzumab and CAR-T cell therapy in relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma

Dahlia Sano, Meng-Hsuan Lin, Victoria Nachar, David W. Hutton, Monalisa Ghosh, Yasmin H. Karimi, Tycel Phillips, J. Weiss, Shannon A. Carty, Iman Ahmed, Ryan Wilcox
article en

Abstract

T cell redirecting therapies, including mosunetuzumab (mosun), axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel), and tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel), are FDA-approved for relapsed refractory follicular lymphoma (FL) in the 3rd line and beyond. There's no head-to-head clinical trial data to compare their effectiveness. These products differ in administration, hospitalization requirements, and toxicity profiles, impacting therapy selection. We developed a Markov model spanning one to 10 years from a US payer perspective, using parameters from clinical trials, quality utilities, and billing costs. Our base case analysis over 10 years showed that mosun provided $67,654 more Net Monetary Benefit (NMB) per patient than axi-cel and $111,709 more than tisa-cel. These findings suggest mosun is cost-effective at a $150,000 willingness-to-pay per QALY.

Leukemia & lymphoma/Leukemia and lymphomaVol. 66(10)
Pasadena City College (US), University of Michigan (US), City of Hope (US)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
CAR-T cell therapy research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Cost effectiveness of mosunetuzumab and CAR-T cell therapy in relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma — Dahlia Sano, Meng-Hsuan Lin, et al. · Leukemia & lymphoma/Leukemia and lymphoma (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS