Untangling the participation buzz in urban place-making: mechanisms and effects

Place-making is a promising approach to foster strong communities in cities. While participation has always been central to urban place-making, novel approaches such as using co-design and digital technologies change how stakeholders participate in the design of place-making interventions and the potential effect of these interventions. These new approaches open up questions on how participation works in place-making and how it is facilitated to achieve the intended outcomes. Through a literature review, 23 articles were selected and analysed using qualitative analysis informed by program theory. This allows us to understand the goals and workings of participation in place-making and its influence on the place-making itself. Findings include that designers of place-making interventions often do not explicitly consider their participation goal in selecting participatory mechanisms, and that place-making efforts driven by physical space are most effective in achieving impact.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
CoDesign
Published
2025-06-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2025.2514561
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.28
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Untangling the participation buzz in urban place-making: mechanisms and effects

Nicolai Brodersen Hansen, Geertje Slingerland
3 citations
CoDesign
Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
8.28
article

Untangling the participation buzz in urban place-making: mechanisms and effects

Nicolai Brodersen Hansen, Geertje Slingerland
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Place-making is a promising approach to foster strong communities in cities. While participation has always been central to urban place-making, novel approaches such as using co-design and digital technologies change how stakeholders participate in the design of place-making interventions and the potential effect of these interventions. These new approaches open up questions on how participation works in place-making and how it is facilitated to achieve the intended outcomes. Through a literature review, 23 articles were selected and analysed using qualitative analysis informed by program theory. This allows us to understand the goals and workings of participation in place-making and its influence on the place-making itself. Findings include that designers of place-making interventions often do not explicitly consider their participation goal in selecting participatory mechanisms, and that place-making efforts driven by physical space are most effective in achieving impact.

CoDesign
Aalborg University (DK), Delft University of Technology (NL)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
8.28
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Untangling the participation buzz in urban place-making: mechanisms and effects — Nicolai Brodersen Hansen, Geertje Slingerland · CoDesign (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS