Epidemic models with digital and manual contact tracing

Abstract We analyse a Markovian SIR epidemic model where individuals either recover naturally or are diagnosed, leading to isolation and potential contact tracing. Our focus is on digital contact tracing via a tracing app, considering both its standalone use and its combination with manual tracing. We prove that as the population size n grows large, the epidemic process converges to a limiting process, which, unlike with typical epidemic models, is not a branching process due to dependencies created by contact tracing. However, by grouping to-be-traced individuals into macro-individuals, we derive a multi-type branching process interpretation, allowing computation of the reproduction number R . This is then converted to an individual reproduction number $R^\mathrm{(ind)}$ , which, in contrast to R , decays monotonically with the fraction of app-users, while both share the same threshold at 1. Finally, we compare digital (only) contact tracing and manual (only) contact tracing, proving that the critical fraction of app-users, $\pi_{\mathrm{c}}$ , required for $R=1$ is higher than the critical fraction manually contact-traced, $p_{\mathrm{c}}$ , for manual tracing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advances in Applied Probability
Published
2025-06-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/apr.2025.15
Primary Topic
COVID-19 Digital Contact Tracing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Epidemic models with digital and manual contact tracing

Tom Britton, Dongni Zhang
Advances in Applied Probability
COVID-19 Digital Contact Tracing
article

Epidemic models with digital and manual contact tracing

Tom Britton, Dongni Zhang
article en

Abstract

Abstract We analyse a Markovian SIR epidemic model where individuals either recover naturally or are diagnosed, leading to isolation and potential contact tracing. Our focus is on digital contact tracing via a tracing app, considering both its standalone use and its combination with manual tracing. We prove that as the population size n grows large, the epidemic process converges to a limiting process, which, unlike with typical epidemic models, is not a branching process due to dependencies created by contact tracing. However, by grouping to-be-traced individuals into macro-individuals, we derive a multi-type branching process interpretation, allowing computation of the reproduction number R . This is then converted to an individual reproduction number $R^\mathrm{(ind)}$ , which, in contrast to R , decays monotonically with the fraction of app-users, while both share the same threshold at 1. Finally, we compare digital (only) contact tracing and manual (only) contact tracing, proving that the critical fraction of app-users, $\pi_{\mathrm{c}}$ , required for $R=1$ is higher than the critical fraction manually contact-traced, $p_{\mathrm{c}}$ , for manual tracing.

Advances in Applied ProbabilityVol. 57(4)
Stockholm University (SE)
Vetenskapsrådet
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
COVID-19 Digital Contact Tracing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.