Orthogonal assessment of six extraction methods for GC–MS based short-chain fatty acid quantification in fecal samples

Short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) are prominent regulators of host physiology and are closely related to the pathophysiology of many metabolic diseases. SCFAs are predominately generated by microbial fermentation of dietary fiber in the gut. Therefore, efficient, reproducible, and affordable analytical methods are needed to identify and quantify SCFAs in a complex fecal sample. In this study, five different SCFAs (acetic acid, butyric acid, propionic acid, valeric acid, and isobutyric acid) were compared using six different extraction methods (HCl-DE, NaOH-Hexane, H<sub>3</sub>PO<sub>4</sub>Butanol, H<sub>3</sub>PO<sub>4</sub>-EA, NaHCO<sub>3</sub>-MTBE, and SPME) based on gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) analysis. The specificity, linearity, recovery, precision, and sensitivity of different analytical approaches were systematically assessed using SCFA chemical standards and further validated with human fecal samples, ensuring cross-species applicability. Our results revealed that no single method performed optimally for all SCFAs, but rather, distinct methods exhibited compound-specific advantages. Moreover, this study provides a practical guideline for balancing recovery, reproducibility, and extraction efficiency for method selection based on research purposes. The H<sub>3</sub>PO<sub>4</sub>-Butanol method displayed superior recovery accuracy for valeric acid (100.16 ± 0.81 % and 101.82 ± 4.83 % recovery rate for low and median spiked concentrations, respectively). It also exhibited minimum intra-day repeatability (0.92 % to 5.67 % RSD values) and good linearity (R<sup>2</sup>=0.94-0.99) across chemical mixtures. However, it showed the best extracted efficiency for butyric acid and best sensitivity for isobutyruc acid in fecal samples. Moreover, the H<sub>3</sub>PO<sub>4</sub>-EA method showed the highest recovery accuracy for isobutyric acid (103.21 ± 11.07 % to 104.79 ± 3.59 % recovery rate for all three different spiked concentrations) and the smallest inter-day repeatability (3.37 % to 7.25 % RSD values). The SPME method exhibited superior recovery accuracy for acetic acid (81.16 ± 21.17 % to 94.08 ± 10.92 % recovery rate for all three different spiked concentrations) and extracted the highest levels of SCFAs for acetic acid, propionic acid, and isobutyric acid. Finally, the application of these methods in human clinical samples revealed significant alterations of SCFA levels in patients with missed abortion, supporting their potential for translational studies. Overall, our results indicated that H<sub>3</sub>PO<sub>4</sub>-Butanol and SPME are the recommended methods for studying SCFAs in fecal samples.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Chromatography A
Published
2025-06-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2025.466132
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.61

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Orthogonal assessment of six extraction methods for GC–MS based short-chain fatty acid quantification in fecal samples

Ting­-Li Han, Lina Hu, Huanhuan Jiang, Jingcong Dai et al.
2 citations
Journal of Chromatography A
Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
1.61
article

Orthogonal assessment of six extraction methods for GC–MS based short-chain fatty acid quantification in fecal samples

Ting­-Li Han, Lina Hu, Huanhuan Jiang, Jingcong Dai, Richard D. Cannon, Xinyong Dong, Yang Yang, Qibin Li, Li Li Wang
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) are prominent regulators of host physiology and are closely related to the pathophysiology of many metabolic diseases. SCFAs are predominately generated by microbial fermentation of dietary fiber in the gut. Therefore, efficient, reproducible, and affordable analytical methods are needed to identify and quantify SCFAs in a complex fecal sample. In this study, five different SCFAs (acetic acid, butyric acid, propionic acid, valeric acid, and isobutyric acid) were compared using six different extraction methods (HCl-DE, NaOH-Hexane, H<sub>3</sub>PO<sub>4</sub>Butanol, H<sub>3</sub>PO<sub>4</sub>-EA, NaHCO<sub>3</sub>-MTBE, and SPME) based on gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) analysis. The specificity, linearity, recovery, precision, and sensitivity of different analytical approaches were systematically assessed using SCFA chemical standards and further validated with human fecal samples, ensuring cross-species applicability. Our results revealed that no single method performed optimally for all SCFAs, but rather, distinct methods exhibited compound-specific advantages. Moreover, this study provides a practical guideline for balancing recovery, reproducibility, and extraction efficiency for method selection based on research purposes. The H<sub>3</sub>PO<sub>4</sub>-Butanol method displayed superior recovery accuracy for valeric acid (100.16 ± 0.81 % and 101.82 ± 4.83 % recovery rate for low and median spiked concentrations, respectively). It also exhibited minimum intra-day repeatability (0.92 % to 5.67 % RSD values) and good linearity (R<sup>2</sup>=0.94-0.99) across chemical mixtures. However, it showed the best extracted efficiency for butyric acid and best sensitivity for isobutyruc acid in fecal samples. Moreover, the H<sub>3</sub>PO<sub>4</sub>-EA method showed the highest recovery accuracy for isobutyric acid (103.21 ± 11.07 % to 104.79 ± 3.59 % recovery rate for all three different spiked concentrations) and the smallest inter-day repeatability (3.37 % to 7.25 % RSD values). The SPME method exhibited superior recovery accuracy for acetic acid (81.16 ± 21.17 % to 94.08 ± 10.92 % recovery rate for all three different spiked concentrations) and extracted the highest levels of SCFAs for acetic acid, propionic acid, and isobutyric acid. Finally, the application of these methods in human clinical samples revealed significant alterations of SCFA levels in patients with missed abortion, supporting their potential for translational studies. Overall, our results indicated that H<sub>3</sub>PO<sub>4</sub>-Butanol and SPME are the recommended methods for studying SCFAs in fecal samples.

Journal of Chromatography AVol. 1757
Dalian Medical University (CN), Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University (CN), The Affiliated Yongchuan Hospital of Chongqing Medical University (CN), Chongqing Emergency Medical Center (CN), University of Otago (NZ), Chongqing Medical University (CN)
Chongqing Science and Technology Commission, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing Municipal Education Commission, Servier
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
1.61
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.