Trade Facilitation and Unemployment in Nigeria

This study examined the impact of trade facilitation on unemployment in Nigeria from 1985 to 2022. Trade facilitation was measured using trade openness, foreign direct investment (FDI), real exchange rate, and official development assistance, while unemployment was measured by the unemployment rate. An ex-post facto research design was used, relying on annual time series data from the Central Bank of Nigeria. Data analysis included descriptive statistics, trend analysis, ADF unit root test, bounds cointegration test, and ARDLFindings showed a long-run relationship among the variables. Trade openness and FDI had a significant negative effect on unemployment in both the short and long run. Real exchange rate had a positive but non-significant effect, while official development assistance had a negative and significant effect in the short run and a negative, non-significant effect in the long run.The study concluded that trade facilitation helps reduce unemployment in Nigeria. It recommended that the government promote trade openness in labour-intensive sectors and support SMEs in accessing global markets to boost job creation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Development and Economic Sustainability
Published
2025-02-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.37745/ijdes.13/vol13n27692
Primary Topic
Unemployment and Economic Growth
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Trade Facilitation and Unemployment in Nigeria

Williams Odiche, Sylvester Udeorah, T.S. Sanusi
International Journal of Development and Economic Sustainability
Unemployment and Economic Growth
article

Trade Facilitation and Unemployment in Nigeria

Williams Odiche, Sylvester Udeorah, T.S. Sanusi
article en

Abstract

This study examined the impact of trade facilitation on unemployment in Nigeria from 1985 to 2022. Trade facilitation was measured using trade openness, foreign direct investment (FDI), real exchange rate, and official development assistance, while unemployment was measured by the unemployment rate. An ex-post facto research design was used, relying on annual time series data from the Central Bank of Nigeria. Data analysis included descriptive statistics, trend analysis, ADF unit root test, bounds cointegration test, and ARDLFindings showed a long-run relationship among the variables. Trade openness and FDI had a significant negative effect on unemployment in both the short and long run. Real exchange rate had a positive but non-significant effect, while official development assistance had a negative and significant effect in the short run and a negative, non-significant effect in the long run.The study concluded that trade facilitation helps reduce unemployment in Nigeria. It recommended that the government promote trade openness in labour-intensive sectors and support SMEs in accessing global markets to boost job creation.

International Journal of Development and Economic SustainabilityVol. 13(2)
Centre for European Reform (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Unemployment and Economic Growth
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.