Analysis of 112 Patients With Congenital Heart Disease Undergoing Cardiac Transplantation: Impact of Pretransplant Ventricular Assist Device

BackgroundWe reviewed our management strategy and outcome data for all 112 patients with congenital heart disease (CHD) who underwent cardiac transplantation at University of Florida from January 2011, to January 2022, and evaluated the impact of a pretransplant ventricular assist device (VAD).MethodsContinuous variables are presented as mean (SD); median [interquartile range] (range); categorical variables are presented as N (%). Univariable associations with long-term survival were assessed with Cox proportional hazards models. The impact of pretransplant VAD on survival was estimated with multivariable models.ResultsPretransplant VAD was present in 24 of 112 patients who underwent cardiac transplantation (21.4%). Patients with a VAD were younger (years): 3.0 (3.8); 1 [0.5,6] (0.1,14) versus 12.9 (14.9); 9 [0.6,19] (0.1,58), <i>P </i>= .008. More patients with a VAD had prior cardiac operations: 24 of 24 (100%) versus 71 of 88 (80.7%), <i>P </i>= .021 and were more likely to receive an ABO-incompatible transplant: 6 of 24 (25%) versus 7 of 88 (8%), <i>P </i>= .032.Univariable associations with long-term mortality include: Number of prior cardiac surgeries-hazard ratio (HR) multiplies by 1.2 for each additional surgery (1.02-1.44), <i>P </i>= .029.Pretransplant renal dysfunction - HR = 2.8 (1.21-6.68), <i>P </i>= .017.Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) time at transplant: HR multiplies by 1.1 for each 10 min increase above the minimum CPB time in this series (1.03-1.19), <i>P </i>= .008.In multivariable analysis, pretransplant VAD does not impact survival when controlling for each one of the factors shown in univariable analysis to be associated with long-term survival. Kaplan-Meier five-year survival (95% confidence interval) is 77.4% (68.4%-87.5%) for all patients; 76.5% (66.7%-87.9%) without pretransplant VAD and 84.3% (69.3%-99.9%) with pretransplant VAD (<i>P </i>= .436).ConclusionOur single-institution analysis of 112 patients with CHD undergoing cardiac transplantation over 11.25 years reveals similar survival in patients with (n = 24) and without (n = 88) pretransplant VAD. The presence of a pretransplant VAD is not a risk factor for survival after transplantation in patients with CHD.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
World Journal for Pediatric and Congenital Heart Surgery
Published
2025-06-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/21501351251329887
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.67
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis of 112 Patients With Congenital Heart Disease Undergoing Cardiac Transplantation: Impact of Pretransplant Ventricular Assist Device

Yuriy Stukov, Giles J. Peek, Dan Neal, Liam Kugler et al.
1 citations
World Journal for Pediatric and Congenital Heart Surgery
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
0.67
article

Analysis of 112 Patients With Congenital Heart Disease Undergoing Cardiac Transplantation: Impact of Pretransplant Ventricular Assist Device

Yuriy Stukov, Giles J. Peek, Dan Neal, Liam Kugler, Omar M. Sharaf, Jeffrey Phillip Jacobs, Matthew Purlee, Biagio “Bill” A. Pietra, Dipankar Gupta, Mark Steven Bleiweis, Joseph Philip, Colton Brown, John‐Anthony Coppola, Frederick J. Fricker
article en
1 citations

Abstract

BackgroundWe reviewed our management strategy and outcome data for all 112 patients with congenital heart disease (CHD) who underwent cardiac transplantation at University of Florida from January 2011, to January 2022, and evaluated the impact of a pretransplant ventricular assist device (VAD).MethodsContinuous variables are presented as mean (SD); median [interquartile range] (range); categorical variables are presented as N (%). Univariable associations with long-term survival were assessed with Cox proportional hazards models. The impact of pretransplant VAD on survival was estimated with multivariable models.ResultsPretransplant VAD was present in 24 of 112 patients who underwent cardiac transplantation (21.4%). Patients with a VAD were younger (years): 3.0 (3.8); 1 [0.5,6] (0.1,14) versus 12.9 (14.9); 9 [0.6,19] (0.1,58), <i>P </i>= .008. More patients with a VAD had prior cardiac operations: 24 of 24 (100%) versus 71 of 88 (80.7%), <i>P </i>= .021 and were more likely to receive an ABO-incompatible transplant: 6 of 24 (25%) versus 7 of 88 (8%), <i>P </i>= .032.Univariable associations with long-term mortality include: Number of prior cardiac surgeries-hazard ratio (HR) multiplies by 1.2 for each additional surgery (1.02-1.44), <i>P </i>= .029.Pretransplant renal dysfunction - HR = 2.8 (1.21-6.68), <i>P </i>= .017.Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) time at transplant: HR multiplies by 1.1 for each 10 min increase above the minimum CPB time in this series (1.03-1.19), <i>P </i>= .008.In multivariable analysis, pretransplant VAD does not impact survival when controlling for each one of the factors shown in univariable analysis to be associated with long-term survival. Kaplan-Meier five-year survival (95% confidence interval) is 77.4% (68.4%-87.5%) for all patients; 76.5% (66.7%-87.9%) without pretransplant VAD and 84.3% (69.3%-99.9%) with pretransplant VAD (<i>P </i>= .436).ConclusionOur single-institution analysis of 112 patients with CHD undergoing cardiac transplantation over 11.25 years reveals similar survival in patients with (n = 24) and without (n = 88) pretransplant VAD. The presence of a pretransplant VAD is not a risk factor for survival after transplantation in patients with CHD.

World Journal for Pediatric and Congenital Heart SurgeryVol. 17(1)
University of Florida (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
0.67
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.