Excesses, Resisting Interpretation, and the Negative in Three Latin American Imaginaries

Abstract This article will explore three ethnographies—of Brazilian Umbanda, Cuban espiritismo , and Chilean ufology—whose cosmoses are variably self-referential, paradoxical, and absurd. I follow their anti-logics and argue that they exhibit, firstly, an excess, and secondly, a resistance to interpretation. Taking my concept of excess from Marisol de la Cadena, and of resisting interpretation from Susan Sontag, I argue that a radical version of resisting interpretation must go beyond experience and describe ontological evacuation itself—a ‘nothingness’ that holds all possibilities simultaneously; or an excess that contradicts either-or logics. I suggest we look at both the horror narrative and apophatic mysticism, which resist thought itself, as well as language, for a heuristic that is able to deal with ethnographies that defy logics of meaning or common sense.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Religion and Society
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3167/arrs.2024.150105
Primary Topic
Latin American Literature Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Excesses, Resisting Interpretation, and the Negative in Three Latin American Imaginaries

Diana Espírito Santo
Religion and Society
Latin American Literature Studies
article

Excesses, Resisting Interpretation, and the Negative in Three Latin American Imaginaries

Diana Espírito Santo
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article will explore three ethnographies—of Brazilian Umbanda, Cuban espiritismo , and Chilean ufology—whose cosmoses are variably self-referential, paradoxical, and absurd. I follow their anti-logics and argue that they exhibit, firstly, an excess, and secondly, a resistance to interpretation. Taking my concept of excess from Marisol de la Cadena, and of resisting interpretation from Susan Sontag, I argue that a radical version of resisting interpretation must go beyond experience and describe ontological evacuation itself—a ‘nothingness’ that holds all possibilities simultaneously; or an excess that contradicts either-or logics. I suggest we look at both the horror narrative and apophatic mysticism, which resist thought itself, as well as language, for a heuristic that is able to deal with ethnographies that defy logics of meaning or common sense.

Religion and SocietyVol. 15(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Latin American Literature Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.