Highly efficient co-removal of zinc and manganese during passive treatment of mine drainage: Mechanisms, microbiology and application

Previous investigations have reported the coeval removal of zinc (Zn) and manganese (Mn) under aerobic circumneutral pH conditions during the passive treatment of mine waters, but the removal mechanisms are less well established. Here 7 months of data are presented on Mn and Zn removal from a field based passive mine water treatment trial on mine water of pH 5.42, containing Mn 1.5 mg/l, and Zn 0.8 mg/l. The final treatment train comprised two aerobic vertical flow reactors (VFRs) operated in series, the first with granite/pyrolusite media and the second with limestone media (retention times ∼19 h and ∼ 3 h respectively). Only limited Mn and Zn removal was observed in the granite/pyrolusite VFR reactor. When limestone vertical flow reactors were added to the treatment train after month 4, Mn removal was quickly established with coeval removal of Zn. The Mn concentrations decreased from a mean of 1169 μg/l and 1154 μg/l in the influents to the two limestone reactors, to 245 μg/l and 234 μg/l in the effluents, respectively. Zn concentrations decreased from a mean of 791 μg/l and 935 μg/l (influent) to 228 μg/l and 236 μg/l in the effluents, respectively, with effluent concentrations on occasion reaching as low as 15 μg/l. Detailed analyses of the precipitates bulk and surficial chemistry indicate Zn removal in association with manganese oxides (MnOx) accreted on the surface of limestone as the predominant removal mechanism. Sequential extraction data indicates a significant proportion of Zn also being associated in the “adsorbed/carbonate-associated” phase. Interestingly, based on the difference in influent and effluent concentrations, the overall ratio of Mn:Zn removal was close to 2:1 suggestive of the precipitation of a Mn Zn oxide mineral directly from the mine water. Microbial community analyses reveal distinct structure in the accumulated ochreous sludge in the granite/pyrolusite and on the grains of limestone in the limestone reactors. The granite/pyrolusite VFR sludge was populated with iron oxidising microbes including Gallionella and Pseudomonas , of which Pseudomonas can also oxidize Mn. The limestone reactors were populated with several genera of Mn oxidising bacteria including Pseudomonas and Leptothrix , suggesting biotic mechanisms are important. These data reveal that Zn may be removed to concentrations was low as 15 μg/l when the Zn is co-removed with Mn within limestone reactors. This opens opportunities for this mechanism to be exploited within nature-based passive treatment systems for removal of Zn. • Zn concentrations polished to low concentrations in an aerobic treatment system. • Limestone VFRs treatment train highly efficient in Mn and Zn removal. • Zn associated with the exchangeable MnO x phase precipitated on limestone. • Mn:Zn removal of ∼2:1 suggests coprecipitation or direct Mn Zn oxide mineral formation. • The presence of manganese oxidising bacteria in LSRs indicate potential contribution to Mn removal.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecological Engineering
Published
2025-06-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2025.107681
Primary Topic
Mine drainage and remediation techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Highly efficient co-removal of zinc and manganese during passive treatment of mine drainage: Mechanisms, microbiology and application

Devin Sapsford, Ilemona C. Okeme, Pallavee Srivastava
Ecological Engineering
Mine drainage and remediation techniques
article

Highly efficient co-removal of zinc and manganese during passive treatment of mine drainage: Mechanisms, microbiology and application

Devin Sapsford, Ilemona C. Okeme, Pallavee Srivastava
article en

Abstract

Previous investigations have reported the coeval removal of zinc (Zn) and manganese (Mn) under aerobic circumneutral pH conditions during the passive treatment of mine waters, but the removal mechanisms are less well established. Here 7 months of data are presented on Mn and Zn removal from a field based passive mine water treatment trial on mine water of pH 5.42, containing Mn 1.5 mg/l, and Zn 0.8 mg/l. The final treatment train comprised two aerobic vertical flow reactors (VFRs) operated in series, the first with granite/pyrolusite media and the second with limestone media (retention times ∼19 h and ∼ 3 h respectively). Only limited Mn and Zn removal was observed in the granite/pyrolusite VFR reactor. When limestone vertical flow reactors were added to the treatment train after month 4, Mn removal was quickly established with coeval removal of Zn. The Mn concentrations decreased from a mean of 1169 μg/l and 1154 μg/l in the influents to the two limestone reactors, to 245 μg/l and 234 μg/l in the effluents, respectively. Zn concentrations decreased from a mean of 791 μg/l and 935 μg/l (influent) to 228 μg/l and 236 μg/l in the effluents, respectively, with effluent concentrations on occasion reaching as low as 15 μg/l. Detailed analyses of the precipitates bulk and surficial chemistry indicate Zn removal in association with manganese oxides (MnOx) accreted on the surface of limestone as the predominant removal mechanism. Sequential extraction data indicates a significant proportion of Zn also being associated in the “adsorbed/carbonate-associated” phase. Interestingly, based on the difference in influent and effluent concentrations, the overall ratio of Mn:Zn removal was close to 2:1 suggestive of the precipitation of a Mn Zn oxide mineral directly from the mine water. Microbial community analyses reveal distinct structure in the accumulated ochreous sludge in the granite/pyrolusite and on the grains of limestone in the limestone reactors. The granite/pyrolusite VFR sludge was populated with iron oxidising microbes including Gallionella and Pseudomonas , of which Pseudomonas can also oxidize Mn. The limestone reactors were populated with several genera of Mn oxidising bacteria including Pseudomonas and Leptothrix , suggesting biotic mechanisms are important. These data reveal that Zn may be removed to concentrations was low as 15 μg/l when the Zn is co-removed with Mn within limestone reactors. This opens opportunities for this mechanism to be exploited within nature-based passive treatment systems for removal of Zn. • Zn concentrations polished to low concentrations in an aerobic treatment system. • Limestone VFRs treatment train highly efficient in Mn and Zn removal. • Zn associated with the exchangeable MnO x phase precipitated on limestone. • Mn:Zn removal of ∼2:1 suggests coprecipitation or direct Mn Zn oxide mineral formation. • The presence of manganese oxidising bacteria in LSRs indicate potential contribution to Mn removal.

Ecological EngineeringVol. 219
Cardiff University (GB)
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Mine drainage and remediation techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.