How low can you go? Tracking eye movements during reading at different sampling rates

Eye-movement research has revolutionized our understanding of reading, but the use of eye-tracking techniques in investigating the reading process is still limited by the cost of high-precision eye-tracking, which limits research to laboratories with sufficient resources. It is important to evaluate to what extent cognitive processes during reading can be measured with less expensive eye-tracking devices. One such way may be to use devices with a lower sampling rate, which are much less expensive than high-sampling rate eye-trackers. We recorded readers' eye movements during reading at different sampling rates and show that it is possible to measure the classic effect of word frequency on fixation duration, reflecting ongoing cognitive processing during reading, at sampling rates ranging from 250 to 2000 Hz. We simulate even lower sampling rates and show that, with a sufficiently large sample size, it is possible to detect the effect of word frequency even at very low sampling rates (30-125 Hz). Our results demonstrate that, in principle, low sampling rates are not an obstacle to studying the effects of cognitive processing during reading.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Behavior Research Methods
Published
2025-06-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-025-02713-3
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Reading and Literacy Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
10.33

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How low can you go? Tracking eye movements during reading at different sampling rates

Jon Andoni Duñabeitia, Bernhard Angele, Zeynep Gunes Ozkan, Marina Serrano-Carot
3 citations
Behavior Research Methods
Reading and Literacy Development
10.33
article

How low can you go? Tracking eye movements during reading at different sampling rates

Jon Andoni Duñabeitia, Bernhard Angele, Zeynep Gunes Ozkan, Marina Serrano-Carot
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Eye-movement research has revolutionized our understanding of reading, but the use of eye-tracking techniques in investigating the reading process is still limited by the cost of high-precision eye-tracking, which limits research to laboratories with sufficient resources. It is important to evaluate to what extent cognitive processes during reading can be measured with less expensive eye-tracking devices. One such way may be to use devices with a lower sampling rate, which are much less expensive than high-sampling rate eye-trackers. We recorded readers' eye movements during reading at different sampling rates and show that it is possible to measure the classic effect of word frequency on fixation duration, reflecting ongoing cognitive processing during reading, at sampling rates ranging from 250 to 2000 Hz. We simulate even lower sampling rates and show that, with a sufficiently large sample size, it is possible to detect the effect of word frequency even at very low sampling rates (30-125 Hz). Our results demonstrate that, in principle, low sampling rates are not an obstacle to studying the effects of cognitive processing during reading.

Behavior Research MethodsVol. 57(7)
Universitat de València (ES), Universidad Nebrija (ES)
Comunidad de Madrid, Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación, Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnología, Agencia Estatal de Investigación
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Reading and Literacy Development
10.33
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.