Zero-Shot End-to-End Relation Extraction in Chinese: A Comparative Study of Gemini, LLaMA, and ChatGPT

This study investigates the performance of various large language models (LLMs) on zero-shot end-to-end relation extraction (RE) in Chinese, a task that integrates entity recognition and relation extraction without requiring annotated data. While LLMs show promise for RE, most prior work focuses on English or assumes pre-annotated entities, leaving their effectiveness in Chinese RE largely unexplored. To bridge this gap, we evaluate ChatGPT, Gemini, and LLaMA based on accuracy, efficiency, and adaptability. ChatGPT demonstrates the highest overall performance, balancing precision and recall, while Gemini achieves the fastest inference speed, making it suitable for real-time applications. LLaMA underperforms in both accuracy and latency, highlighting the need for further adaptation. Our findings provide insights into the strengths and limitations of LLMs for zero-shot Chinese RE, shedding light on trade-offs between accuracy and efficiency. This study serves as a foundation for future research aimed at improving LLM adaptability to complex linguistic tasks in Chinese NLP.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-03-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icaace65325.2025.11019781
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Topic Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.96
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Zero-Shot End-to-End Relation Extraction in Chinese: A Comparative Study of Gemini, LLaMA, and ChatGPT

H. Y. Zhang, Yixian Shen, Yiyi Tao, Shaoshuai Du et al.
2 citations
Topic Modeling
4.96
article

Zero-Shot End-to-End Relation Extraction in Chinese: A Comparative Study of Gemini, LLaMA, and ChatGPT

H. Y. Zhang, Yixian Shen, Yiyi Tao, Shaoshuai Du, Xinyu Qiu, Yanxin Shen, Chuanqi Shi
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This study investigates the performance of various large language models (LLMs) on zero-shot end-to-end relation extraction (RE) in Chinese, a task that integrates entity recognition and relation extraction without requiring annotated data. While LLMs show promise for RE, most prior work focuses on English or assumes pre-annotated entities, leaving their effectiveness in Chinese RE largely unexplored. To bridge this gap, we evaluate ChatGPT, Gemini, and LLaMA based on accuracy, efficiency, and adaptability. ChatGPT demonstrates the highest overall performance, balancing precision and recall, while Gemini achieves the fastest inference speed, making it suitable for real-time applications. LLaMA underperforms in both accuracy and latency, highlighting the need for further adaptation. Our findings provide insights into the strengths and limitations of LLMs for zero-shot Chinese RE, shedding light on trade-offs between accuracy and efficiency. This study serves as a foundation for future research aimed at improving LLM adaptability to complex linguistic tasks in Chinese NLP.

Boston University (US), Northeastern University (US), Johns Hopkins University (US), Simon Fraser University (CA), University of California San Diego (US), Amsterdam University of the Arts (NL), University of Amsterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Topic Modeling
4.96
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Zero-Shot End-to-End Relation Extraction in Chinese: A Comparative Study of Gemini, LLaMA, and ChatGPT — H. Y. Zhang, Yixian Shen, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS