Benchmark Suite for Resilience Assessment of Deep Learning Models

The reliability assessment of systems powered by artificial intelligence (AI) is becoming a crucial step prior to their deployment in safety and mission-critical systems. Recently, many efforts have been made to develop sophisticated techniques to evaluate and improve the resilience of AI models against the occurrence of random hardware faults. However, due to the intrinsic nature of such models, the comparison of the results obtained in state-of-the-art works is crucial, as reference models are missing. Moreover, their resilience is strongly influenced by the training process, the adopted framework and data representation, and so on. To enable a common ground for future research targeting CNN resilience analysis/hardening, this work proposes a first benchmark suite of DL models commonly adopted in this context, providing the models, the training/test data, and the resilience-related information (fault list, coverage, etc.) that can be used as a baseline for fair comparison. To this end, this research identifies a set of axes that have an impact on the resilience and classifies some popular CNN models, in both PyTorch and TensorFlow. Some final considerations are drawn, showing the relevance of a benchmark suite tailored for the resilience context.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems
Published
2025-06-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/tcad.2025.3578297
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.48

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Benchmark Suite for Resilience Assessment of Deep Learning Models

Luca Cassano, Ernesto Sánchez, Salvatore Pappalardo, Cristiana Bolchini et al.
1 citations
IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems
Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
2.48
article

Benchmark Suite for Resilience Assessment of Deep Learning Models

Luca Cassano, Ernesto Sánchez, Salvatore Pappalardo, Cristiana Bolchini, Antonio Miele, M. Sonza Reorda, V. Turco, Alberto Bosio, Annachiara Ruospo, Dario Passarello
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The reliability assessment of systems powered by artificial intelligence (AI) is becoming a crucial step prior to their deployment in safety and mission-critical systems. Recently, many efforts have been made to develop sophisticated techniques to evaluate and improve the resilience of AI models against the occurrence of random hardware faults. However, due to the intrinsic nature of such models, the comparison of the results obtained in state-of-the-art works is crucial, as reference models are missing. Moreover, their resilience is strongly influenced by the training process, the adopted framework and data representation, and so on. To enable a common ground for future research targeting CNN resilience analysis/hardening, this work proposes a first benchmark suite of DL models commonly adopted in this context, providing the models, the training/test data, and the resilience-related information (fault list, coverage, etc.) that can be used as a baseline for fair comparison. To this end, this research identifies a set of axes that have an impact on the resilience and classifies some popular CNN models, in both PyTorch and TensorFlow. Some final considerations are drawn, showing the relevance of a benchmark suite tailored for the resilience context.

IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and SystemsVol. 45(1)
Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 (FR), École Centrale de Lyon (FR), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Politecnico di Torino (IT), Institut des Nanotechnologies de Lyon (FR), Institut National des Sciences Appliquées de Lyon (FR), Politecnico di Milano (IT)
European Commission, Agence Nationale de la Recherche
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
2.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.