Reducing energy and environmental footprint in agriculture: A study on drone spraying vs. conventional methods

Agricultural practices significantly contribute to resource depletion and greenhouse gas emissions, underscoring the urgent need for environmental sustainability in this sector. This research assesses the energy efficiency and environmental impacts of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) technology compared to traditional spraying methods for wheat farms in Lorestan province, Iran. Experiments were conducted randomly with three repetitions, and data were analyzed using Simapro Impact 2002 + software, evaluating four primary categories and 15 midpoint indicators. The findings reveal that conventional spraying consumes 2.43 times more energy than drone spraying, with values of 365.26 MJ/ha and 146.84 MJ/ha, respectively. Additionally, the Global Warming Potential (GWP) for pesticide application is 41.284 kg CO2ha-1 for conventional methods and 14.485 kg CO2ha-1 for drones. Diesel emissions from tractors in traditional spraying represent the most significant environmental burden, while battery production and charging for drones contribute the largest share among various impacts. These results highlight the potential of UAV technology to enhance energy efficiency and reduce environmental harm, promoting sustainable agricultural practices. Nonetheless, battery limitations and the need for training remain challenges, and further studies are required to assess long-term impacts and scalability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2025-06-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0323779
Citations
13
Primary Topic
UAV Applications and Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
64.92
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reducing energy and environmental footprint in agriculture: A study on drone spraying vs. conventional methods

Mahmoud Ghasemi-Nejad-Raeini, Morteza Taki, Mojtaba Safaeinejad
13 citations
PLoS ONE
UAV Applications and Optimization
64.92
article

Reducing energy and environmental footprint in agriculture: A study on drone spraying vs. conventional methods

Mahmoud Ghasemi-Nejad-Raeini, Morteza Taki, Mojtaba Safaeinejad
article en
13 citations

Abstract

Agricultural practices significantly contribute to resource depletion and greenhouse gas emissions, underscoring the urgent need for environmental sustainability in this sector. This research assesses the energy efficiency and environmental impacts of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) technology compared to traditional spraying methods for wheat farms in Lorestan province, Iran. Experiments were conducted randomly with three repetitions, and data were analyzed using Simapro Impact 2002 + software, evaluating four primary categories and 15 midpoint indicators. The findings reveal that conventional spraying consumes 2.43 times more energy than drone spraying, with values of 365.26 MJ/ha and 146.84 MJ/ha, respectively. Additionally, the Global Warming Potential (GWP) for pesticide application is 41.284 kg CO2ha-1 for conventional methods and 14.485 kg CO2ha-1 for drones. Diesel emissions from tractors in traditional spraying represent the most significant environmental burden, while battery production and charging for drones contribute the largest share among various impacts. These results highlight the potential of UAV technology to enhance energy efficiency and reduce environmental harm, promoting sustainable agricultural practices. Nonetheless, battery limitations and the need for training remain challenges, and further studies are required to assess long-term impacts and scalability.

PLoS ONEVol. 20(6)
Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University of Khuzestan
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
UAV Applications and Optimization
64.92
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Reducing energy and environmental footprint in agriculture: A study on drone spraying vs. conventional methods — Mahmoud Ghasemi-Nejad-Raeini, Morteza Taki, et al. · PLoS ONE (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS