Modeling Supernova 2023ixf: Lightcurve Degeneracies and Morphological Differences

Abstract Supernova 2023ixf, a type II-P supernova in the spiral galaxy M101, which was first observed in 2023 May, is the closest yet observed this decade. Combining the observed brightness and duration with theoretical scaling relations, we model its lightcurve to reveal the properties of the progenitor at the time of explosion, including its mass, radius, and explosion energy. We simulate these explosions using the stellar evolution/radiation-hydrodynamics codes MESA+STELLA. We find that SN 2023ixf is not easily explained with “normal” stellar evolution, and only models with a small H-rich ejecta mass can fit the lightcurve. We also find that the late-time properties of the lightcurve are better fit by a higher initial-mass ( M ≳ 20 M ⊙ ) star with substantial mass loss during its lifetime, compared to models with lower initial mass ( M ≲ 13 M ⊙ ) and less mass loss.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Research Notes of the AAS
Published
2025-06-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3847/2515-5172/adde46
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.46
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Modeling Supernova 2023ixf: Lightcurve Degeneracies and Morphological Differences

Jared A. Goldberg, Shannon Forde
3 citations
Research Notes of the AAS
Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
3.46
article

Modeling Supernova 2023ixf: Lightcurve Degeneracies and Morphological Differences

Jared A. Goldberg, Shannon Forde
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract Supernova 2023ixf, a type II-P supernova in the spiral galaxy M101, which was first observed in 2023 May, is the closest yet observed this decade. Combining the observed brightness and duration with theoretical scaling relations, we model its lightcurve to reveal the properties of the progenitor at the time of explosion, including its mass, radius, and explosion energy. We simulate these explosions using the stellar evolution/radiation-hydrodynamics codes MESA+STELLA. We find that SN 2023ixf is not easily explained with “normal” stellar evolution, and only models with a small H-rich ejecta mass can fit the lightcurve. We also find that the late-time properties of the lightcurve are better fit by a higher initial-mass ( M ≳ 20 M ⊙ ) star with substantial mass loss during its lifetime, compared to models with lower initial mass ( M ≲ 13 M ⊙ ) and less mass loss.

Research Notes of the AASVol. 9(6)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
3.46
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Modeling Supernova 2023ixf: Lightcurve Degeneracies and Morphological Differences — Jared A. Goldberg, Shannon Forde · Research Notes of the AAS (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS